1979
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889879011729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction study of MgCl2aqueous solutions

Abstract: X‐ray diffraction data for three aqueous solutions of MgCl2 were analyzed. It is shown that in a very concentrated solution the structure and correlation functions can be reproduced almost completely by using a nearest‐neighbor model of ionic hydration, whereas in the more dilute solutions a certain number of interactions between the hydrated cation and external water molecules must also be considered. The mean coordination geometry for the close hydration was found to be octahedral both for cation and anion w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
70
4

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
29
70
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The peak at 4.20 Ä derives from Mg -H2On (HUO" = second shell molecules as found previously [15,16]). …”
Section: A) Correlation Functionssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The peak at 4.20 Ä derives from Mg -H2On (HUO" = second shell molecules as found previously [15,16]). …”
Section: A) Correlation Functionssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The first derives from Mg -H20, interactions (con tributions at about 2.1 Ä, as found in [15] and [16]) and O -O interactions within the Perchlorate anion (contributions at about 2.36 Ä).…”
Section: A) Correlation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general characteristics of the approach have been described elsewhere (Caminiti, Licheri, Piccaluga & Pinna, 1978, 1979bLicheri, Piccaluga & Pinna, 1976); in it, the contribution of discrete interactions to the structure function is accounted for by using the Debye formula modified in such a way that a Gaussian-!ike distribution of interatomic distances can be introduced, while a uniform distribution of distances is described by the formula proposed by Narten & Levy (1969). The hydrated ions were considered independent in all the calculations, since the system does not show any notable tendency towards the formation either of ionic pairs or of complex aggregates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get more detailed information than that given by the experimental G(r), the analysis based on the refinement of a model structure function was used [23][24], The contribution of discrete interactions to the structure function is accounted for by using the Debye formula modified to give a Gaussian like distribution of interatomic distances while a uniform distribution of distances is described by the formula propsed by Narten and Levy [25]. Least squares refinement of the model parameters were performed by the PUTSLR program [26] connected with the generalized least-squares LETA-GROP program [27]; the minimized function was (J = 27 (fobs («) -icalc(s)) 2 .…”
Section: Refinement Of the Structural Model In Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%