2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm25373a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction study of nanocrystalline and amorphous structure within major and minor ampullate dragline spider silks

Abstract: Synchrotron X-ray micro-diffraction experiments were carried out on Nephila clavipes (NC) and Argiope aurantia (AA) major (MA) and minor ampullate (MiA) fibers that make up dragline spider silk. The diffraction patterns show a semi-crystalline structure with β-poly(l-alanine) nanocrystallites embedded in a partially oriented amorphous matrix. A superlattice reflection ‘S’ diffraction ring is observed, which corresponds to a crystalline component larger in size and is poorly oriented, when compared to the β-pol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
175
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
14
175
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3b shows that the diffusion halo in Figure 3a turns into two dependent diffusion rings, and the corresponding one dimension diffracto-gram illustrated in Figure 3g shows two obvious diffraction peaks at the location of the (120-reflection plane with d = 4.36 Angstroms) and the (211-reflection plane with d = 3.73 Angstroms). These data are in harmony with those obtained for spider dragline silk by Sampath et al [32]. One can attribute the improvement of RSDSs properties to the homogeneity of crystal structure occurred by drying treatment and longitudinal mechanical stresses.…”
Section: Structure Of Recombinant-spider Dragline Silkssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3b shows that the diffusion halo in Figure 3a turns into two dependent diffusion rings, and the corresponding one dimension diffracto-gram illustrated in Figure 3g shows two obvious diffraction peaks at the location of the (120-reflection plane with d = 4.36 Angstroms) and the (211-reflection plane with d = 3.73 Angstroms). These data are in harmony with those obtained for spider dragline silk by Sampath et al [32]. One can attribute the improvement of RSDSs properties to the homogeneity of crystal structure occurred by drying treatment and longitudinal mechanical stresses.…”
Section: Structure Of Recombinant-spider Dragline Silkssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This crystalline formation is confirmed from data on Figure 3d and 3f where crystalline domains were directed longitudinally through the RSDS after the mechanical stretching treatment. In addition, one can notice the presence of semi-crystalline structure with nano crystallites inlayed through the amorphous regions [32]. spider dragline silk have the fibrillary structure.…”
Section: Structure Of Recombinant-spider Dragline Silksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis by solid state NMR spectroscopy or Raman microspectroscopy suggests levels of 30 -40%, [29][30][31] as opposed to about 20% identified by XRD. 32 Computer simulations of the crystalline components of silk suggest that the poly-alanine sections align anti-parallel in the H-bonding direction with parallel stacking in the side-chain direction to stabilize the β-sheets. 33,34 The high strength of silk materials is mainly attributed to the nanoconfined crystals (4-6 nm), while the breaking elongation is mainly attributed to the unfolding amorphous region.…”
Section: Silk Structure After Spinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, computational calculations 4 , X-ray diffraction 5 , nuclear magnetic resonance 6 , polarized light microscopy 7 , scanning electron microscopy 7,8 , transmission electron microscopy 9 , Raman spectromicroscopy 10 and, more recently, atomic force microscopy (AFM) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] have been the most commonly used techniques to study the nanoarrangements of silk fibre domains. However, the details of the size, topology, mechanical features and fractional composition of the crystalline and amorphous domains remain to be clarified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%