2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray emission from BH+O star binaries expected to descend from the observed galactic WR+O binaries

Abstract: Context. In the Milky Way, ∼18 Wolf-Rayet+O star (WR+O) binaries are known with estimates of their stellar and orbital parameters. Whereas black hole+O star (BH+O) binaries are thought to evolve from WR+O binaries, only one such system is known in the Milky Way. To resolve this disparity, it was suggested recently that upon core collapse, the WR stars receive large kicks such that most of the binaries are disrupted. Aims. We reassess this issue, with a particular emphasis on the uncertainty in predicting the X… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible selection effect that could explain the high spins in the observed BH-XRB sample relative to the BBH spin distribution is a correlation between BH-XRB detectability and BH spin. Sen et al (2021) argued that rapidly spinning BHs in BH-XRBs are more likely to form accretion disks that lead to longer and brighter X-ray emission. Furthermore, a correlation between BH spins and X-ray detectability may arise if scenarios for spinning up the BH or its progenitor stellar core are more efficient at small orbital periods and BH-XRBs in tight orbits are more detectable (Qin et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible selection effect that could explain the high spins in the observed BH-XRB sample relative to the BBH spin distribution is a correlation between BH-XRB detectability and BH spin. Sen et al (2021) argued that rapidly spinning BHs in BH-XRBs are more likely to form accretion disks that lead to longer and brighter X-ray emission. Furthermore, a correlation between BH spins and X-ray detectability may arise if scenarios for spinning up the BH or its progenitor stellar core are more efficient at small orbital periods and BH-XRBs in tight orbits are more detectable (Qin et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a disk is expected to radiate energy mostly in X-rays (Frank et al 2002). To estimate whether an accretion disk can form, and the corresponding Xray luminosity, we follow the work of Sen et al (2021). We take the maximum possible unseen companion mass as the mass of the BH, which increases the likelihood of accretion disk formation.…”
Section: Wind Accreting Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Cyg X-1 is known to contain a maximally spinning BH of 21.2 M (Miller-Jones et al 2021). Assuming that to be the case, the method of Sen et al (2021) does predict an accretion disk radiating about 700 L , a factor of a few smaller than the observed average of ∼2600 L (Orosz et al 2011). Due to the absence of bright X-rays from HD 94024, a 4 M Kerr BH companion can be excluded.…”
Section: Wind Accreting Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such binaries represent an intermediate evolutionary phase that appears in the majority of evolutionary sequences leading to the formation of BH+BH mergers (Belczynski et al 2002;Giacobbo & Mapelli 2018;Kruckow et al 2018;Marchant et al 2019). As such, OB+BH binaries provide crucial constraints on binary evolution, supernova physics, and the presence of BH kicks (e.g., Fryer et al 2012;Vanbeveren et al 2020;Sen et al 2021). Langer et al (2020) predicted that about 2 to 3% of massive stars should host a BH companion, implying that hundreds of such binaries are lurking in Galactic and extragalactic OB-star catalogues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%