We dedicate this paper to the memory of Tom Wydrzynski and Warwick Hillier, two friends and close colleagues of ours over many years at ANU. The work that Tom initiated with Johannes Messinger, then carried forward with Warwick and their collaborators, transformed our understanding of the OEC and critical aspects of its operation. Their results are remarkable, both as experimental tours de force, but also in the manner by which they define and constrain possibilities, for the system's function and mechanism. These are unique insights, which have often not been accorded the significance they deserve, in our view. Three atomic resolution crystal structures of Photosystem II, in the double flashed, nominal S 3 intermediate state of its Mn 4 Ca Water Oxidising Complex (WOC), have now been presented, at 2.25, 2.35 and 2.08 Å resolution. Although very similar overall, the S 3 structures differ within the WOC catalytic site. The 2.25 Å structure contains only one oxy species (O5) in the WOC cavity, weakly associated with Mn centres, similar to that in the earlier 1.95 Å S 1 structure. The 2.35 Å structure shows two such species (O5, O6), with the Mn centres and O5 positioned as in the 2.25 Å structure and O5À O6 separation of~1.5 Å. In the latest S 3 variant, two oxy species are also seen (O5, Ox), with the Ox group appearing only in S 3 , closely ligating one Mn, with O5À Ox separation < 2.1 Å. The O5 and O6/Ox groups were proposed to be substrate water derived species. Recently, Petrie et al. (Chem. Phys. Chem., 2017) presented large scale Quantum Chemical modelling of the 2.25 Å structure, quantitatively explaining all significant features within the WOC region. This, as in our earlier studies, assumed a 'low' Mn oxidation paradigm (mean S 1 Mn oxidation level of + 3.0, Petrie et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015), rather than a 'high' oxidation model (mean S 1 oxidation level of + 3.5). In 2018 we showed (Chem. Phys. Chem., 2018) this oxidation state assumption predicted two energetically close S 3 structural forms, one with the metal centres and O5 (as OH À ) positioned as in the 2.25 Å structure, and the other with the metals similarly placed, but with O5 (as H 2 O) located in the O6 position of the 2.35 Å structure. The 2.35 Å two flashed structure was likely a crystal superposition of two such forms. Here we show, by similar computational analysis, that the latest 2.08 Å S 3 structure is also a likely superposition of forms, but with O5 (as OH À ) occupying either the O5 or Ox positions in the WOC cavity. This highlights a remarkable structural 'lability' of the WOC centre in the S 3 state, which is likely catalytically relevant to its water splitting function.