2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray Imaging for Gastrointestinal Tracking of Microscale Oral Drug Delivery Devices

Abstract: Microscale devices are promising tools to overcome specific challenges within oral drug delivery. Despite the availability of advanced highquality imaging techniques, visualization and tracking of microscale devices in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is still a challenge. This work explores the possibilities of applying planar X-ray imaging and computed tomography (CT) scanning for visualization and tracking of microscale devices in the GI tract of rats. Microcontainers (MCs) are an example of microscale devic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, imaging of intestinal sections from two rats 2.5 h after dosing, revealed the presence of empty, but otherwise intact, DCMCs in the ileum (Figure 5G). These observations confirm that the DCMCs were structurally undamaged and non‐digested as previously observed, [ 51 ] and that the enteric coating was completely dissolved and the drugs successfully released from both compartments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, imaging of intestinal sections from two rats 2.5 h after dosing, revealed the presence of empty, but otherwise intact, DCMCs in the ileum (Figure 5G). These observations confirm that the DCMCs were structurally undamaged and non‐digested as previously observed, [ 51 ] and that the enteric coating was completely dissolved and the drugs successfully released from both compartments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To evaluate the mucoadhesive properties observed ex vivo for the neutral, pillar, and arrow microcontainer designs, retention and transit times were investigated in an in vivo rat study using planar X-ray imaging for quantitative GI tracking, similarly to what has previously been demonstrated. [15,31] Prior to the study, having n = 2 rats was discussed but chosen in order to reduce the total number of animals needed to look for any apparent differences in GI retention and transit between the different microcon-tainer designs. Furthermore, an appropriate statistical procedure (Gaussian process with a squared exponential kernel and a Poisson likelihood) was going to be applied on the data obtained.…”
Section: Quantitative Gastrointestinal Tracking For Retention and Tra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, MCs were loaded with the contrast agent, BaSO4, then coated with either ZT-80 (the mucoadhesive coating) or EFS100 (the non-mucoadhesive control), loaded into gelatin capsules, and dosed to rats. The movement of the coated MCs after the dosage was tracked and visualized inside the GIT of rats, using a previously reported method [45]. Figure 5A shows representative computed tomography (CT) scan images, while in Figure 5B we can see the corresponding planar X-ray images of the intestines of rats after dosage with the coated MCs.…”
Section: Intestinal Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%