1997
DOI: 10.1116/1.589231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray lithography: Status, challenges, and outlook for 0.13 μm

Abstract: X-ray lithography (XRL) has been under development since the early 1980s, and has reached a state of relative maturity. Numerous devices, including dense and complex integrated circuits, have been fabricated using XRL for one or more critical levels. While development of XRL technology itself continues, XRL is in use in several locations around the world for process development of advanced DRAM (1 Gb and beyond) and logic (0.18 μm and below) integrated circuits. Most of the tool set in use today comes from com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most advanced lithographic technologies enable patterning of the resist materials with line dimensions below 100 nm, [1][2][3][4][5] which thus places new demands on measurement characterization techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most advanced lithographic technologies enable patterning of the resist materials with line dimensions below 100 nm, [1][2][3][4][5] which thus places new demands on measurement characterization techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tantalum was chosen as the absorber for its chemical stability, making it possible to perform repeated cleaning of the mask in an industrial environment. 13 Also, it has been demonstrated by other researchers 7 that Ta has excellent mechanical properties, allowing adequate image placement for the 70 nm fabrication node of the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] However, serial processing limits the throughput and the cost is high. X-ray lithography has high throughput 7,8 but it requires a high capital cost. UV photolithography 9,10 is a widely used method; however, its feature sizes are limited by its diffraction limit of /2 (Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%