2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray nanobeam diffraction imaging of materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operating at a spatial resolution of tens of nanometres, and focusing on an individual crystal, nanoscanning and coherent X-ray diffraction techniques (Coherent Bragg Diffraction Imaging, CBDI) are capable of mapping the strain component along a scattering vector in single crystals (see (Schulli & Leake, 2018) [42] for a recent review). Mapping several reflections in an isolated nano-crystal (Newton et al, 2010) [43] or in embedded grains (Cherukara et al, 2018) [44] enables quantification of the full strain tensor and has recently been used to characterise the full 3D strain tensor field around individual dislocations (Hofmann et al, 2020) [45].…”
Section: Intragranular Strain (Type III Stresses)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating at a spatial resolution of tens of nanometres, and focusing on an individual crystal, nanoscanning and coherent X-ray diffraction techniques (Coherent Bragg Diffraction Imaging, CBDI) are capable of mapping the strain component along a scattering vector in single crystals (see (Schulli & Leake, 2018) [42] for a recent review). Mapping several reflections in an isolated nano-crystal (Newton et al, 2010) [43] or in embedded grains (Cherukara et al, 2018) [44] enables quantification of the full strain tensor and has recently been used to characterise the full 3D strain tensor field around individual dislocations (Hofmann et al, 2020) [45].…”
Section: Intragranular Strain (Type III Stresses)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, thanks to the advanced features of the latest generation synchrotron sources and new X-ray optics [29][30][31][32][33][34], new techniques have been developed for this purpose. Scanning Xray (sub)micro-diffraction (SµXRD) and spectroscopy, e.g., scanning micro X-ray absorption (SµXAS) and scanning micro X-ray fluorescence (SµXRF), constitute an optimal approach [35] to investigate structure fluctuations in several systems like perovskite materials such as La2CuO4+y [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], YBa2Cu3O6.5 [44][45][46][47], K0.8Fe1.6Se2 [48][49][50]. Electronic fluctuations such as short-range Charge Density Waves (CDW) have been detected by resonant X-ray scattering [51][52][53][54][55][56] probing the average structure and by SµXRD [40,[57][58][59][60] probing the spatial distribution of electronic nanometric patches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…two-dimensional MAXIPIX (ESRF, Grenoble, France) detector with a pixel size of 55 × 55 µm 2 , which was mounted 1260 mm downstream from the sample position. Further details of the experimental setup and the X-ray beam focusing at the ID01 beamline can be found in [26,27]. Prior to in situ three-point bending tests, the SFINX-tip and the nanofocused X-ray beam were aligned with respect to a pre-selected Au nanowire by optical microscopy, rendering a precision of a few micrometers followed by AFM imaging and scanning X-ray diffraction mapping using the K-mapping approach available at the ID01 beamline where the sample is continuously scanned through the beam and the diffraction yield at a selected Bragg peak is monitored [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffracted signal was recorded by a two-dimensional MAXIPIX (ESRF, Grenoble, France) detector with a pixel size of 55 × 55 µm 2 , which was mounted 1260 mm downstream from the sample position. Further details of the experimental setup and the X-ray beam focusing at the ID01 beamline can be found in [26,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%