2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2118597119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray nanodiffraction imaging reveals distinct nanoscopic dynamics of an ultrafast phase transition

Abstract: Significance Phase transitions, the changes between states of matter with distinct electronic, magnetic, or structural properties, are at the center of condensed matter physics and underlie valuable technologies. First-order phase transitions are intrinsically heterogeneous. When driven by ultrashort excitation, nanoscale phase regions evolve rapidly, which has posed a significant experimental challenge to characterize. The newly developed laser-pumped X-ray nanodiffraction imaging technique reported… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For thinner epitaxial FeRh films, the substrate-induced stress becomes more relevant and de-stressing is introduced by alternating AF and FM domains at shorter intervals. We suggest that this is the reason behind the observation of small size phase domains (≲500 nm) found so far in the literature for FeRh [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In our case, increasing the film thickness to 200 nm slightly reduces the relative weight of the elastic interaction coming from the substrate, allowing the formation of larger, micron-sized phase domains that can be visualized using optical microscopy.…”
Section: Nucleation and Growth Of Phase Domains In Zero Fieldsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For thinner epitaxial FeRh films, the substrate-induced stress becomes more relevant and de-stressing is introduced by alternating AF and FM domains at shorter intervals. We suggest that this is the reason behind the observation of small size phase domains (≲500 nm) found so far in the literature for FeRh [30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. In our case, increasing the film thickness to 200 nm slightly reduces the relative weight of the elastic interaction coming from the substrate, allowing the formation of larger, micron-sized phase domains that can be visualized using optical microscopy.…”
Section: Nucleation and Growth Of Phase Domains In Zero Fieldsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Furthermore, x-ray nanodiffraction experiments confirmed the sub-micron character of structural phase domains in FeRh [34,35]. FM domain evolution across the phase transition was also studied in real space with complementary techniques that are sensitive to magnetization, such as scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis [36], electron holography and differential phase contrast in transmission electron microscopy [37,38], or nitrogen-vacancy-center magnetometry [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We performed optical pump/X‐ray diffraction nanoprobe microscopy ( Figure a) at Beamline 26‐ID‐C of the Advanced Photon Source (APS) (see Experimental Section). Our setup [ 26 ] employed a pulsed femtosecond laser (343 nm, 300 fs) as an optical excitation source with a repetition rate of 67 kHz. The optical excitation provided photons with above‐bandgap energy to directly create photocarriers in the BiFeO 3 sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 33 ] Such highly convergent X‐ray beam causes the diffraction to spread in q ‐space with an annulus ring shape on the detector (Figure 1c). [ 26 ] To visualize the ferroelectric domains, we performed diffraction imaging by raster scanning the nanoprobe X‐ray beam on the sample. We probed the (002) p Bragg peak of the rhombohedral BFO, where subscript P denotes the pseudo‐cubic unit cell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latent heat and lattice expansion at the first-order AFM-FM phase transition were taken into account in the thermal transport simulation. The heat transport in the plane of the sample, as previously observed using nanodiffraction, 27 was neglected because the length scale of the in-plane thermal transport (∼100 nm) is much smaller than the probing X-ray beam size (50 μm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%