1983
DOI: 10.1086/161051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray observations of 20 3CR radio galaxies and their environs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not a single setup is able to yield the parameters similar to those of the fundamental plane, neither in term of correlation strength, nor in terms of linear regression slopes. In particular, as the correlation is only created by the flux limits, we find ξ RX ≈ 1, as it is expected given that we are simply plotting distance against distance (Feigelson and Berg, 1983). Also as expected, the flux limits have no effect on the mass term, and one therefore finds no mass dependence of the radio luminosity ξ RM ≈ 0.…”
Section: On the Effects Of Flux Limitssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, not a single setup is able to yield the parameters similar to those of the fundamental plane, neither in term of correlation strength, nor in terms of linear regression slopes. In particular, as the correlation is only created by the flux limits, we find ξ RX ≈ 1, as it is expected given that we are simply plotting distance against distance (Feigelson and Berg, 1983). Also as expected, the flux limits have no effect on the mass term, and one therefore finds no mass dependence of the radio luminosity ξ RM ≈ 0.…”
Section: On the Effects Of Flux Limitssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As discussed in the introduction, statistical tools exist to test whether a correlation is, in fact, an artifact of distance, or whether it reflects an underlying luminosity-luminosity relation, even in flux limited samples (Feigelson and Berg, 1983). In MHD03 (section 3) a partial correlation analysis was performed, including all upper limits in the sample using the algorithm for performing Kendall's τ test in the presence of censored data proposed by Akritas & Siebert (1996).…”
Section: The Fundamental Plane Of Black Hole Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of correlations between outputs at different wavelengths is better done by directly comparing luminosities rather than fluxes, since any correlation in the luminosity space will be distorted in the flux space unless the luminosities are linearly correlated (Feigelson & Berg 1983;Padovani 1992). However, the use of luminosities instead of fluxes always introduces a redshift bias in flux limited samples, as luminosities are strongly correlated with redshift.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that it is in some measure created by the common dependence on redshift of the gamma and radio luminosities rather than their intrinsic correlation. Redshift bias and instrument flux limits are the two factors most likely to create spurious correlations (Elvis et al 1978;Feigelson & Berg 1983;Muecke et al 1997;Bloom 2008). In this study we have tried to alleviate their effect by including the upper limits in radio fluxes and luminosities and by using correlation tests taking the redshift bias into account.…”
Section: Flux Densities and Luminositiesmentioning
confidence: 99%