2006
DOI: 10.1086/507947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Ray Observations of Type Ia Supernovae with Swift : Evidence of Circumstellar Interaction for SN 2005ke

Abstract: We present a study of the early (days to weeks) X-ray and UV properties of eight Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) that have been extensively observed with the X-Ray Telescope (XRT) and UV/Optical Telescope (UVOT) on board Swift, ranging from 5 to 132 days after the outburst. SN 2005ke is tentatively detected (at a 3-3.6 j level of significance) in X-rays based on deep monitoring with the XRT ranging from 8 to 120 days after the outburst. The inferred X-ray luminosity

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
114
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
114
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A few days later, the object was classified as an underluminous Type Ia event caught before maximum light (Patat et al 2005). Spectroscopic and photometric data were presented by Immler et al (2006), Bufano et al (2009), Folatelli et al (2010, and Contreras et al (2010), to which we refer the reader for the general properties of this object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few days later, the object was classified as an underluminous Type Ia event caught before maximum light (Patat et al 2005). Spectroscopic and photometric data were presented by Immler et al (2006), Bufano et al (2009), Folatelli et al (2010, and Contreras et al (2010), to which we refer the reader for the general properties of this object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supernovae Ia SN 2005ke which exploded on 2005 Nov. 06 ± 2 days (with optical and X-ray maxima occurring ∼20 and respectively ∼45 days later Immler et al 2006) is 14 arcmin away from the BAT flare but these two events coincide in time. The large scale image is affected by a circular artefact centred on SN 2005ke, we must conclude that this flare is an artefact from the observations of SN 2005ke.…”
Section: Dubious Casesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although initially weak, the X-ray radiation in the shocked regions increases as more heated and compressed material is accumulated. To take the effects of CSM interaction into account, we adopt an analytic model of the underlying X-ray continuum emission (Immler et al 2006;Hughes et al 2007). …”
Section: Observability Of the 59 Kev Linementioning
confidence: 99%