1994
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90508-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray photoelectron and Auger electron spectroscopic studies of pyrrhotite and mechanism of air oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
183
1
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
19
183
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The S 2p binding energy is indicative of the type of sulfide present since FeS has a binding energy of 161.5 eV whereas in FeS 2 the binding energy shifts to 162.2 eV. [49][50][51] Thus, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy also indicates the presence of FeS.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S 2p binding energy is indicative of the type of sulfide present since FeS has a binding energy of 161.5 eV whereas in FeS 2 the binding energy shifts to 162.2 eV. [49][50][51] Thus, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy also indicates the presence of FeS.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical reactivity of iron sulfides in the environment and during mineral processing, as well as their electronic and optical properties strongly depend on the composition and structure of the real surfaces formed in natural and technological environ-ments. It is known from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and other surface-sensitive techniques [2][3][4][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] that iron can be easily released from the lattice of these compounds, leaving non-equilibrium metal-deficient surface layers. The resulting surface sulfur enrichment is generally modest for oxidation-resistant pyrite, with intrinsic (fractured) pyrite surfaces possibly even being S-deficient [2][3][4][5][6][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting surface sulfur enrichment is generally modest for oxidation-resistant pyrite, with intrinsic (fractured) pyrite surfaces possibly even being S-deficient [2][3][4][5][6][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In contrast, the metal depleted layer incorporates di-and polysulfide species and low-spin Fe(II) and can be as thick as several micrometers at pyrrhotite reacted in acidic solutions under certain conditions [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]; for example, Pratt and co-workers [30][31][32] have reported Auger depth profiles of several reacted pyrrhotites. It remains, however, unclear how the undersurface species alter with depth, in particular, because Ar + ion sputtering employed in many works could seriously affect the chemical state of Fe and S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pratt et al (1994) proposed a mechanism for pyrrhotite oxidation by which the only movement of species during the reaction was the transfer of electrons from the crystal lattice and the diffusion of iron towards the surface ferric oxyhyroxide layer. Pratt et al (1994) argued that the most reactive sites for oxygen reduction were associated with the ferric iron-sulfur bonds and the vacancies in the pyrrhotite crystal lattice. The presence of vacancies would therefore facilitate electron transfer as well as the diffusion of iron through the crystal lattice to the surface, thereby assisting the oxidation reaction.…”
Section: Crystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe 3+ was noted by Janzen (1996) to be a much stronger oxidising agent than O 2 . The presence of both Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ has been argued to be present in the pyrrhotite structure in order to maintain charge balance (Bertaut, 1953;Pratt et al, 1994;Mikhlin and Tomashevich, 2005). Therefore, magnetic pyrrhotite of formula Fe 3þ 2 Fe 2þ 5 S 2À 8 (Fe 7 S 8 ) contains proportionally more Fe 3+ in its structure than non-magnetic pyrrhotite of formula Fe 3þ 2 Fe 2þ 7 S 2À 10 (Fe 9 S 10 ).…”
Section: Mineral Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%