2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9797(03)00416-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies of hydrophilic surfaces modified via admicellar polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, indirect evidence came from the observation that the amount of extractable sample was less with higher amounts of DVB. Wei et al recently confirmed the problems in extracting polymer from a surface after admicellar polymerization [21]. Well-known properties can help explain the observed effects of cross-linking in this study.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, indirect evidence came from the observation that the amount of extractable sample was less with higher amounts of DVB. Wei et al recently confirmed the problems in extracting polymer from a surface after admicellar polymerization [21]. Well-known properties can help explain the observed effects of cross-linking in this study.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Surface chemical elements of the particles before and after admicellar polymerization were tested by XPS (insets of Figure 2(a),(b)). S 2p was tested with an atomic concentration of 2.26% (inset of Figure 2(b)) because it was very difficult to thoroughly remove the surfactant molecules 38 . This means that the carbon element in the test result was derived from both the PPy and SDS molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the effect of surfactant concentration on advancing contact angle has been investigated. Theoretically, admicellar polymerization works best when the concentration of surfactant approaches the cmc. , Figure a shows that the highest advancing contact angles are obtained at SDS concentrations of 5.0 or 6.0 mM, which are statistically indistinguishable and just below the cmc (8.2 mM) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%