1976
DOI: 10.1063/1.432672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of amorphous ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is not coherent with the measured ESD threshold of cluster desorption at 70 eV [14]. Considering a ionization potential (IP) at 537 eV [56], the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons would reach 70 eV for a photon energy of 607 eV, which is above our photon energy range. This might instead be linked to multielectron excitations (i.e.…”
Section: Desorption Of Protonated Clustersmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, this is not coherent with the measured ESD threshold of cluster desorption at 70 eV [14]. Considering a ionization potential (IP) at 537 eV [56], the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons would reach 70 eV for a photon energy of 607 eV, which is above our photon energy range. This might instead be linked to multielectron excitations (i.e.…”
Section: Desorption Of Protonated Clustersmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The UV photon energy used in the present experiment (10-11 eV) is lower than the vertical ionization energy of water molecules in gas phase (12.6 eV), but greater than the photoionization threshold of amorphous ice (∼9 eV) observed in photoelectron emission spectroscopic studies. 52 Therefore, we consider it possible that a similar direct photoionization process occurs in the present ice samples. In this case, the H 3 O + forming process can be the photoionization of water molecules to H 2 O + in the ice (Reaction (R3)) followed by proton transfer from H The photoelectrons generated in the first step may initially be trapped in the ice film and might then participate in subsequent reactions in the ice, or they may be ejected from the sample into vacuum or a Ru substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…14,22 Low energy ions neutralize at the surface, resulting in positive holes (ions) in the solid. 20,21 Since the ionization energies for Xe and He (12.15 and 24.5 eV, respectively) 25 are greater than the ionization threshold for ice (∼11 eV), 26 the formation of hydronium is energetically favorable as 21,27 penetration depth (<20 nm). Effects of backscattered ions and sputtered ions are negligible in our experiments.…”
Section: A Dielectric Constant At 30 Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of backscattered ions and sputtered ions are negligible in our experiments. Secondary electrons are ejected by different mechanisms; 22 their energy is limited to a few eV due to the large gap (∼11 eV) 26 between the top of the valence band and the vacuum level of ASW. If the secondary electrons escape into vacuum, additional holes would result in the solid, near its surface (the electron escape depth is a few nm).…”
Section: A Dielectric Constant At 30 Kmentioning
confidence: 99%