2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2021.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray production cross sections induced by carbon ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured cross sections were compared to published datasets, available in literature, for validation. As shown in Figure 3, ratios of experimental XPCS comparing our data for C projectiles in Bi showed fairly good agreement, at 57 -62% with the dataset by Gorlachev et al [29], at 47 -56% with the dataset by Bhattacharya et al [30], and 79 -94% for that by Ejeh et al [19]. The discrepancies of the experimental datasets may be due to experimental uncertainties in the measurement procedure, a challenge commonly seen with XPCS measurements as detailed by Lapicki and Miranda [31].…”
Section: X-ray Production Cross Section Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The measured cross sections were compared to published datasets, available in literature, for validation. As shown in Figure 3, ratios of experimental XPCS comparing our data for C projectiles in Bi showed fairly good agreement, at 57 -62% with the dataset by Gorlachev et al [29], at 47 -56% with the dataset by Bhattacharya et al [30], and 79 -94% for that by Ejeh et al [19]. The discrepancies of the experimental datasets may be due to experimental uncertainties in the measurement procedure, a challenge commonly seen with XPCS measurements as detailed by Lapicki and Miranda [31].…”
Section: X-ray Production Cross Section Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As shown in Fig. 3 , ratios of experimental XPCS comparing our data for C projectiles in Bi showed varying degrees of agreement, at 57–62% with the dataset by Gorlachev et al 31 , at 47–56% with the dataset by Bhattacharya et al 32 , and 79–94% for that by Ejeh et al 21 . The discrepancies of the experimental datasets may be due to experimental uncertainties in the measurement procedure, a challenge commonly seen with XPCS measurements as detailed by Lapicki and Miranda 33 .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%