2003
DOI: 10.1086/375011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X‐Ray Pulses from Accretion Columns: Contributions to the Energy Dependence of the Pulse Shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, depending on to the geometry of the emitting region and the observer's line of sight, this effect could make the accretion columns visible from all directions (Kraus 2001;Kraus et al 2003), thus affecting the pulse profile in a significant way. In addition, the pulse profiles luminosity dependence probably reflects a change in the physical condition of the accretion column.…”
Section: Timing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, depending on to the geometry of the emitting region and the observer's line of sight, this effect could make the accretion columns visible from all directions (Kraus 2001;Kraus et al 2003), thus affecting the pulse profile in a significant way. In addition, the pulse profiles luminosity dependence probably reflects a change in the physical condition of the accretion column.…”
Section: Timing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was discussed by Kraus et al (2003), who find that scattering in the upper accretion flow might affect the formation of the pulse-profile and spectra in a major way and, in fact, be responsible for the majority of the hard photons coming from the source. The magnetic field in scattering region might already be compatible with the one estimated from the observed CRSF energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreting pulse profiles in terms of the underlying emission pattern is far from evident since various effects, including highly anisotropic cross-sections for emission and scattering and lightbending around the neutron star must be taken into account (Kraus et al 2003). For A 0535+26, Caballero et al (2011a) have disentangled the contribution of the two single pole components for A 0535+26 using pulse profiles from the 2005 August normal outburst.…”
Section: Pulse Profile Studymentioning
confidence: 99%