2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.07.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray radiation damage of organic semiconductor thin films during grazing incidence diffraction experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary measurements concerned the control of the exposure time to the highly collimated X-ray synchrotron beam generating photoelectrons which may affect the OFET response on one hand, and consequently the parameters extracted, and, on the other hand cause radiation damage to the organic film. [31][32][33] By applying V DS = V GS = -20 V, the source-drain current (I DS ) and the source-gate current (I GS ) were continuously measured (Figure 2a) while X-ray measurements around the 001 reflection were carried out every 40 minutes (/2 and  scan, RC, reported in Figure S5) to monitor the evolution of stacking layer periodicity. The occurrence of the bias stress during the device operation is evidenced by the characteristic decrease of |I DS |, compensated by the photocurrent generated by Xray irradiation (inset in The RC shift to smaller angles can be ascribed to a lattice expansion along the film thickness (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary measurements concerned the control of the exposure time to the highly collimated X-ray synchrotron beam generating photoelectrons which may affect the OFET response on one hand, and consequently the parameters extracted, and, on the other hand cause radiation damage to the organic film. [31][32][33] By applying V DS = V GS = -20 V, the source-drain current (I DS ) and the source-gate current (I GS ) were continuously measured (Figure 2a) while X-ray measurements around the 001 reflection were carried out every 40 minutes (/2 and  scan, RC, reported in Figure S5) to monitor the evolution of stacking layer periodicity. The occurrence of the bias stress during the device operation is evidenced by the characteristic decrease of |I DS |, compensated by the photocurrent generated by Xray irradiation (inset in The RC shift to smaller angles can be ascribed to a lattice expansion along the film thickness (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spikes are not reflected in the XRR data, where it has to be stressed that XRR is an integral method. They, however, also could be a consequence of degradation effects of the P3HT layer during the XRR measurements [48].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments were performed under a helium atmosphere using the dome of the DHS900 attachment (Resel et al, 2003) to reduce sample degradation (Neuhold et al, 2012). .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the known crystal structure of NNN, its electron density is determined to 397 nm À3 which yields a refractive index of n org = 1 À with = 2.48 Â 10 À6 and, finally, C,organic = (2) 1/2 = 0.128 . The critical angle of the amorphous silicon oxide substrate is determined on the basis of electron densities obtained from X-ray reflectivity investigations (Neuhold et al, 2012) to C,substrate = 0.166 for the present X-ray wavelength. The observed peak maximum of the Yoneda peak lies exactly between these two values; however, the experimental setup does not allow separating the two contributions due to limited resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%