“…Several areas of research in DM and DBT, such as many of the approaches for scatter correction (Sechopoulos et al , 2007b; Feng and Sechopoulos, 2011; Feng et al , 2014; Diaz et al , 2014; Kim et al , 2015) and thickness correction (Snoeren and Karssemeijer, 2004; Kallenberg and Karssemeijer, 2012) algorithms, require simulating realistic 3D compressed breast shapes (some approaches for scatter correction such as the one proposed by Kim et al (2015) do not require this). Moreover, other areas of research like patient dosimetry (Dance, 1990; Dance et al , 2000; Sechopoulos et al , 2007a; Sechopoulos et al , 2012), breast density estimation (Pertuz et al , 2016; Gubern-Merida et al , 2014), image registration and segmentation (Richard et al , 2006; Hipwell et al , 2016), and 3D breast software phantoms (Bakic et al , 2002; Bakic et al , 2011; Wang et al , 2012; O’Connor et al , 2013; Hsu et al , 2013; Kiarashi et al , 2015) could also benefit from objective shape models of compressed breasts to improve their accuracy and relevance.…”