2011
DOI: 10.3233/xst-2011-0288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray scattering tomography for biological applications

Abstract: The conventional attenuation contrast imaging does not yield satisfactory sensitivity and specificity for weakly absorbing media, such as biological soft tissues. The x-ray scattering offer an important contrast mechanism to reveal structural features and density fluctuation within an object. This scattering signal carries information at the molecular and supra-molecular level, and has a tremendous implication for biomedical and other applications. In this paper, we develop a scattering imaging approach to rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poisson random variable with mean and variance 𝜆 𝜙 = 10 9 photons∕mm 2 ∕s for a total scan time of 1 s and 𝜆 𝜙 = 5 × 10 9 photons∕mm 2 ∕s for a scan time of 10 s in the phantom and medical image simulations, respectively. To capture stochastic noise during the simulation, pre-scatter attenuation, scattering, and postscatter attenuation were all treated as Poisson events, with only their expected values following the framework in Equations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). While our reconstruction model approximates a global attenuation map, postscatter attenuation was treated as energy dependent during the simulation.…”
Section: Source Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poisson random variable with mean and variance 𝜆 𝜙 = 10 9 photons∕mm 2 ∕s for a total scan time of 1 s and 𝜆 𝜙 = 5 × 10 9 photons∕mm 2 ∕s for a scan time of 10 s in the phantom and medical image simulations, respectively. To capture stochastic noise during the simulation, pre-scatter attenuation, scattering, and postscatter attenuation were all treated as Poisson events, with only their expected values following the framework in Equations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). While our reconstruction model approximates a global attenuation map, postscatter attenuation was treated as energy dependent during the simulation.…”
Section: Source Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2001, Leclair and Johns showed the viability of X‐ray forward scatter for scatter image reconstruction using a plastic phantom 9 . In 2011, Cong and Wang proposed a compressed‐sensing‐based scatter imaging scheme 5 . Redler et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise is added as follows. First, we recall that the data function ÎŚ is constructed as a linear superposition of functions φ jk , which, in turn, are related the physical measurements of intensity W jk by (5). We therefore add noise directly to the functions φ jk and then construct the data function of the star transform, ÎŚ, according to (9).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of X-rays, account of scattering is simplified because, for the physical parameters encountered in typical applications, the single-scattering approximation can be used safely. All this has stimulated interest in using singlescattered photons for tomographic imaging [1][2][3][4][5][6]. We also note that, under suitable conditions, single-scattering regime can be applicable to optical imaging as well, e.g., in the mesoscopic scattering regime [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incident light is however heavily scattered inside a medium when the medium is optically thick; this usually happens in the case of human body. This problem is called scattering tomography and recently studied in optics [4,5], physics [6,7], computer vision [8,9], and even computer graphics [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%