2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray Structure-Guided Discovery of a Potent, Orally Bioavailable, Dual Human Indoleamine/Tryptophan 2,3-Dioxygenase (hIDO/hTDO) Inhibitor That Shows Activity in a Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract: Human indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (hIDO1) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (hTDO) have been closely linked to the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD); nevertheless, development of dual hIDO1 and hTDO inhibitors to evaluate their potential efficacy against PD is still lacking. Here, we report biochemical, biophysical, and computational analyses revealing that 1H-indazole-4-amines inhibit both hIDO1 and hTDO by a mechanism involving direct coordination with the heme ferrous and ferric states. Crystal struct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the sulfur–bromine halogen bond can be estimated from the potencies of the indazole ligands 12 (PDB ID 7e0s) and 13 (PDB ID 7e0t), which differ only in the bromine position. The IC 50 value of the ligand with the sulfur–bromine halogen bond is only better by a factor of two (0.64 versus 1.23 μM) . As manifest by the methyl substituent also frequently found in this position, hydrophobic ligand–protein contacts certainly contribute to increasing the binding affinity of substituted ligands.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The influence of the sulfur–bromine halogen bond can be estimated from the potencies of the indazole ligands 12 (PDB ID 7e0s) and 13 (PDB ID 7e0t), which differ only in the bromine position. The IC 50 value of the ligand with the sulfur–bromine halogen bond is only better by a factor of two (0.64 versus 1.23 μM) . As manifest by the methyl substituent also frequently found in this position, hydrophobic ligand–protein contacts certainly contribute to increasing the binding affinity of substituted ligands.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The IC 50 value of the ligand with the sulfur−bromine halogen bond is only better by a factor of two (0.64 versus 1.23 μM). 43 As manifest by the methyl substituent also frequently found in this position, hydrophobic ligand−protein contacts certainly contribute to increasing the binding affinity of substituted ligands. Additionally, the influence of the aromatic substituents on the electronic structure of the heme binding group can modulate the binding affinity.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indazoles are also known haem binders, and the indazol-4-amine scaffold developed by IOmet Pharma 54 yielded selective nanomolar TDO inhibitors and dual IDO1/TDO inhibitors 55–57 . X-ray structures of the complexes between IDO1 and some indazol-4-amines such as compound 8 have recently been resolved 57 . These compounds provide access to pocket B while preserving a LE of up to 0.47 kcal/mol/HA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the growth of 4T1 breast cancer is initially inhibited by selective IDO1 blockade, but resistance develops, with elevated levels of Kyn, suggesting alternate mechanisms involving IDO2 and/or TDO . Thus, cotargeting IDO1/2 and TDO by developing dual or pan-inhibitors is a reasonable strategy. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%