Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The orientational drawing of polymers is known to be terminated because of sample rupture. The limiting draw ratio λlim reached may be different (either large or small) depending on the polymer and the actual drawing conditions. The purpose of the present work is to identify the change of supermolecular structure of polymer fibers which results in the termination of orientational drawing. Small‐and wide‐angle x‐ray diffraction were used to study the variation of geometrical parameters of this structure with increasing draw ratio λ. The geometrical parameters discussed are the dispersions (fluctuation) of long periods and of longitudinal sizes of crystalline as well as amorphous regions. In this study we used fibers of poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(ε‐caprolactam), polyoxymethylene, and poly(4,4′‐diphenyloxide) pyromellitimide. It is found that the long period dispersion of these polymers, drawn under different conditions, increases to approximately the same value for different samples drawn to the limit, this relative standard deviation δL of long periods being 0.30‐0.40. It is also found that the crystallite size dispersion does not increase with increasing λ; the increase of λL is due to increasing dispersion of the amorphous region lengths. For poly(vinyl alcohol) fibers drawn to the limit under different conditions and which have different λlim, the relative standard deviation of the sizes of amorphous regions δA turned out to be about the same (ca. 0.60). The latter evidence gives grounds to suggest that the rupture of polymers under drawing is associated with reaching a high degree of amorphous region size dispersion. In those regions which are considerably below the average size there probably will appear local overstress and molecular ruptures because the relative deformation of these regions is much larger than that of the adjacent regions in the cross section of the sample.
The orientational drawing of polymers is known to be terminated because of sample rupture. The limiting draw ratio λlim reached may be different (either large or small) depending on the polymer and the actual drawing conditions. The purpose of the present work is to identify the change of supermolecular structure of polymer fibers which results in the termination of orientational drawing. Small‐and wide‐angle x‐ray diffraction were used to study the variation of geometrical parameters of this structure with increasing draw ratio λ. The geometrical parameters discussed are the dispersions (fluctuation) of long periods and of longitudinal sizes of crystalline as well as amorphous regions. In this study we used fibers of poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(ε‐caprolactam), polyoxymethylene, and poly(4,4′‐diphenyloxide) pyromellitimide. It is found that the long period dispersion of these polymers, drawn under different conditions, increases to approximately the same value for different samples drawn to the limit, this relative standard deviation δL of long periods being 0.30‐0.40. It is also found that the crystallite size dispersion does not increase with increasing λ; the increase of λL is due to increasing dispersion of the amorphous region lengths. For poly(vinyl alcohol) fibers drawn to the limit under different conditions and which have different λlim, the relative standard deviation of the sizes of amorphous regions δA turned out to be about the same (ca. 0.60). The latter evidence gives grounds to suggest that the rupture of polymers under drawing is associated with reaching a high degree of amorphous region size dispersion. In those regions which are considerably below the average size there probably will appear local overstress and molecular ruptures because the relative deformation of these regions is much larger than that of the adjacent regions in the cross section of the sample.
SynopsisFor many aliphatic and wholly aromatic polymer fibers, meridional small-angle x-ray reflections (SAXR's) are not observed. The morphological features which give rise to this effect have received little attention in the literature. I t is sometimes speculated that this is evidence of a morphological homogeneity along the fiber axis (no fluctuation of electron density-no long periods), ignoring other possible reasons (morphology is heterogeneous but very irregular or the maximum intensity of SAXR ( I -) is low and SAXR cannot be observed against the background of diffuse scattering.) Fibers with homogeneous crystalline morphology should have an elastic modulus E, clase to that of the crystallites E,, along the polymer chains over a broad range of stresses. Rut, as was found in this work for the overwhelming majority of such nonreflection fibers (including Kevlar aramid fibers) there is a considerable difference between E,, and E, (for some nonreflection fibers the ratio E,/E, is on the order of 10). This means that their morphology is heterogeneous along the fiber axis and contains "weaker" intercrystalline regions. This heterogeneity appeared to be regular enough to give rise to SAXR, as determined from the appearance of SAXR during elastic extension and after the beginning of pyrolysis in some nonreflection fibers. Thus, it was concluded that the lack of observable SAXR for these fibers is a result of the weakness of I,,relative to the diffuse scattering. Support for this statement is seen in the analysis of the decrease of I,,,, to zero with increasing draw ratio for poly(viny1 alcohol) fibers.The key factors influencing the decrease of I,, in this case were found to be the decrease of fibril diameter (fibril splitting), an increase of the dispersion of the long periods and some possible decrease in the density difference between crystalline and amorphous regions. The particular combinations of such factors can be different for each particular case of missing SAXR and are discussed in this paper.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.