1991
DOI: 10.1086/170837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray variability of GX 339 - 4 in its very high state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

35
394
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
35
394
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of variability power due to Poisson noise was determined fitting the high-frequency part (above 100 Hz) of the PSD with a constant. Then, the average PSDs have been Poisson noise-subtracted, and renormalized adopting the squared fractional rms normalization (Miyamoto et al 1991). We corrected the RXTE data for instrumental dead-time (which produces an over-estimate of the intrinsic Poisson noise level) using the dead-time model of Zhang et al (1995Zhang et al ( , 1996.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of variability power due to Poisson noise was determined fitting the high-frequency part (above 100 Hz) of the PSD with a constant. Then, the average PSDs have been Poisson noise-subtracted, and renormalized adopting the squared fractional rms normalization (Miyamoto et al 1991). We corrected the RXTE data for instrumental dead-time (which produces an over-estimate of the intrinsic Poisson noise level) using the dead-time model of Zhang et al (1995Zhang et al ( , 1996.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PDS of the individual segments were merged together, sorted in order of increasing frequency, and rebinned in frequency to have at least 40 points per bin. The PDS were white noise subtracted and normalized such that their integral over a frequency range ν 1 − ν 2 gives the squared fractional rms variability of the light curves due to variations on time scales from ν −1 2 to ν −1 1 (Belloni & Hasinger 1990;Miyamoto et al 1991). Figure 1 shows the power density spectra (PDS) of all the sources studied in this work, together with the best-fit powerlaw model and residuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average PDS was obtained by calculating and averaging the power spectra for each interval using Xronos version 5.21. The PDS were normalized according to Miyamoto et al (1991). Figure 2a shows the PDS in the (0.2−10) keV energy band and shows a QPO peak around at ∼ 0.5 mHz (2.4 σ) with an integrated rms of 5% ± 1%.…”
Section: Timing Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%