“…obtained from a previous obtained from a previous determination (Weber et al,determination (Weber et al, 1998b) 1998b Computer (Altomare et al, 1994) 1994) 1994) 1994) Xtal CRYLSQ (Hall et al, Xtal CRYLSQ (Hall et al, Xtal CRYLSQ (Hall et aL, Xtal CRYLSQ (Hall et al, 1994) 1994) 1994) 1994) Xtal BONDLA CIFIO (HallXtal BONDLA CIFIO (HallXtal BONDLA CIFIO (HallXtal BONDLA CIFIO (Hall et al, 1994(Hall et al, ) et al, 1994(Hall et al, ) et al, 1994(Hall et al, ) et al, 1994 significant differences in terms of bond distances and angles, as shown by half normal probability plots (Nardelli, 1983); the main differences are due to the tert-butyl group conformation and the torsion angle of the C(21)-C(26) phenyl ring in molecule 2 of (2a). Apart from the twist of the phenyl rings at C(1), the observed geometries compare well with those of the previously reported analogous compounds [see (I) (Weber et aL, 1996(Weber et aL, , 1998a].…”