2005
DOI: 10.1086/444378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XBootes: An X‐Ray Survey of the NDWFS Bootes Field. I. Overview and Initial Results

Abstract: We obtained a 5 ksec deep Chandra X-ray Observatory ACIS-I map of the 9.3 square degree Boötes field of the NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey. Here we describe the data acquisition and analysis strategies leading to a catalog of 4642 (3293) point sources with 2 or more (4 or more) counts, corresponding to a limiting flux of roughly 4(8) × 10 −15 erg cm −2 s −1 in the 0.5-7 keV band. These Chandra XBoötes data are unique in that they consitute the widest contiguous X-ray field yet observed to such a faint flux limit.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
104
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors base their estimate M BH on the L B,bul − M BH relation after estimating the bulge luminosity of the host galaxy in the B band, while the bolometric luminosity for X-ray AGN are derived from the bolometric correction of Hopkins et al (2007); for radio AGNs that are not detected in X-rays, they used the X-ray stacking results to derive approximate upper limits on the X-ray AGN luminosity, while for IR AGNs that are not detected in X-rays, L bol is derived from the rest-frame 4.5 µm luminosity. We also compare this with data from Kollmeier et al (2006), derived from the AGES survey and consisting of X-ray (XBootes survey, Murray et al 2005 or mid-infrared (Eisenhardt et al 2004) point sources with optical magnitude R ≤ 21.5 mag and optical emission-line spectra characteristic of AGNs. Black hole masses were estimated using virial relationships and Hβ MgII, and CIV emission-line widths, while bolometric luminosities were estimated using the bolometric correction of Kaspi et al (2000) to the monochromatic luminosities at 5100 Å.…”
Section: The Distributions Of the Eddington Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors base their estimate M BH on the L B,bul − M BH relation after estimating the bulge luminosity of the host galaxy in the B band, while the bolometric luminosity for X-ray AGN are derived from the bolometric correction of Hopkins et al (2007); for radio AGNs that are not detected in X-rays, they used the X-ray stacking results to derive approximate upper limits on the X-ray AGN luminosity, while for IR AGNs that are not detected in X-rays, L bol is derived from the rest-frame 4.5 µm luminosity. We also compare this with data from Kollmeier et al (2006), derived from the AGES survey and consisting of X-ray (XBootes survey, Murray et al 2005 or mid-infrared (Eisenhardt et al 2004) point sources with optical magnitude R ≤ 21.5 mag and optical emission-line spectra characteristic of AGNs. Black hole masses were estimated using virial relationships and Hβ MgII, and CIV emission-line widths, while bolometric luminosities were estimated using the bolometric correction of Kaspi et al (2000) to the monochromatic luminosities at 5100 Å.…”
Section: The Distributions Of the Eddington Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the sky area covered by largest contiguous surveys did not exceed several (e.g. XMM-COSMOS: Hasinger et al 2007; XBootes: Murray et al 2005) to several tens of square degrees (e.g. XMM-LSS: Chiappetti et al 2012;XWAS: Esquej et al 2013;XXL: Pierre et al 2011), which in particular limited our knowledge of the evolution and clustering properties of the most luminous AGN severely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources at these intermediate fluxes are responsible for a large fraction of the X-ray background as they sample the region around the break in the X-ray source counts Mateos et al 2008). A number of campaigns have been dedicated to the optical-to-radio characterization of X-ray sources selected at A&A 557, A123 (2013) different X-ray depths like the XBöotes survey (Murray et al 2005;Brand et al 2006), the Extended Groth strip Survey (EGS Georgakakis et al 2006), the HELLAS2XMM survey (Cocchia et al 2007;Fiore et al 2003), the XMM-Newton and Chandra surveys in the COSMOS field Elvis et al 2009;Brusa et al 2010), and the Bright Ultra-Hard XMM-Newton Survey (BUXS; Mateos et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%