2022 International Conference on Machine Learning, Computer Systems and Security (MLCSS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/mlcss57186.2022.00077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Xception Net & Vision Transformer: A comparative study for Deepfake Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to risk classification for multidisease classification the Ensemble 2 performs best with metric scores of (accuracy = 76.92%, f1-score = 0.7128, precision = 0.5579, recall = 0.7063). The models taken for ensemble systems are: XceptionNet [26], Resnet152V2 [25] and EfficientNetV2M [27] as they are the top performers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to risk classification for multidisease classification the Ensemble 2 performs best with metric scores of (accuracy = 76.92%, f1-score = 0.7128, precision = 0.5579, recall = 0.7063). The models taken for ensemble systems are: XceptionNet [26], Resnet152V2 [25] and EfficientNetV2M [27] as they are the top performers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been used for both risk classification and multi disease classification. The models used during training were DenseNet 201 [24], ResNet152V2 [25], XceptionNet [26], EfficientNetV2 (S, M, L) [27], EfficientNetB7 [28], MobileNetV2 [29]. Each of these models were trained for 30 epochs.…”
Section: B Model Training and Fine Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations