2004
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2004.1276115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

xCP: Peer-to-Peer content protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some systems for transferring content between terminals within a single household are proposed in [20] and [25], for example.…”
Section: Import/exportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some systems for transferring content between terminals within a single household are proposed in [20] and [25], for example.…”
Section: Import/exportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some early systems simply fix an upper bound on the number of devices permitted in a domain [9,86], with the expectation that this number would be chosen to represent the upper limit of the number of devices owned by a single household. Other systems use the licence issuer as the domain controller [84], so that the rights-holder is able to determine directly what devices should be members of a domain.…”
Section: Authorised Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers and industry participants have suggested various schemes for the rights sharing problem [6,8,9,12,[14][15][16]. One of them is the authorized domain model that permits a consumer to create a content sharing group, which is composed of a limited number of devices, named as a domain [6,9,12,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%