Xiphinema brasiliense, nova espécie de nematóide do Brasil, parasita de Solanum tuberosum L.

Lordello, L. G. E.

doi:10.1590/s0006-87051951000100010

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A revised polytomous key code sensu Loof & Luc (1990) for X. hunaniense identifi cation is: A1-B4-C4-D4-E1-F2-G2-H2-I3-J4-K2-L1. Lordello, 1951 (Fig. 2 (Lordello, 1951) and other populations (Cordero, 2003), except for a higher b and c value (5.50 vs 5.05 and 41.60 vs 24.55) (Lordello, 1951), but lie within the ranges of those reported by Cordero (2003).…”

Section: Morphological Descriptionsupporting

confidence: 82%

“…Lordello, 1951 (Fig. 2 (Lordello, 1951) and other populations (Cordero, 2003), except for a higher b and c value (5.50 vs 5.05 and 41.60 vs 24.55) (Lordello, 1951), but lie within the ranges of those reported by Cordero (2003). A revised polytomous key code sensu Loof and Luc (1990) for X. brasiliense identifi cation is: A1-B4-C5-D5-E1-F2-G2(3)-H1(2)-I3-J5-K?-L1.…”

Section: Morphological Descriptionsupporting

confidence: 82%

“…Thus these three species are all valid species and can be differentiated by molecular data of 28S D2-D3 rDNA. Xiphinema brasiliense has been found in Brazil (Lordello, 1951), Guatemala, Ceylon and Nigeria (Cohn & Sher, 1972), the Ivory Coast and Australia (Luc, 1981), Peru (Alkemade & Loof, 1990), India (Loof et al, 2001), Venezuela (Cordero, 2003), Taiwan (Ni et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004), China (Wu, 2007). Liu et al (1995) identifi ed a population from Sageretia theezans Brongn in Guangdong as X. brasiliense only based on morphology, but Song et al (1998) considered this population as X. hunaniense by morphological observation compared with a population of X. hunaniense from bonsai in Shanghai.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Becc. (Alkemade & Loof, 1990;Cordero, 2003;Diaz-Silveira & Herrera, 1998;Lordello, 1951; Oliveira et al, 2003;Wu, 2007 (CABI, 2011;Xu et al, 1995). Xiphinema hunaniense is reported from Hunan, Zhejiang, Guangxi, Fujian, and Shanghai (Pan et al, 2000;Wang et al, 1996;Xu et al, 1995;Wu et al, 2007;Song et al, 1998 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Morphological and molecular characterization of Xiphinema species from Shenzhen, China

Zeng¹,

Zhang

et al. 2016

Helminthologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary During a nematode biodiversity survey from 2012 to 2014 in Shenzhen, China, ten nematode populations (SZX1301–SZX1310) of Xiphinema were recovered from rhizosphere of different plants, namely Acacia mangium (SZX1306), A. confuse (SZX1309), Blechnum orientale (SZX1301, SZX1302, SZX1307, SZX1308), Litchi chinensis (SZX1304, SZX1310) in Tianxinshan and Gleichenia linearis (SZX1303, SZX1305) in Yangmeikeng environmental monitoring sites. Morphological and molecular profiles of these populations were determined. Three species of Xiphinema, i.e., X. hunaniense Wang & Wu, 1992, X. brasiliense Lordello, 1951 and X. americanum Cobb, 1913 sensu lato were identified using morphological characters and molecular data of partial 18S and 28S D2–D3 rDNA expansion segments. Four populations (SZX1301–SZX1304) were X. hunaniense, one population (SZX1305) X. brasiliense, and five populations (SZX1306–SZX1310) X. americanum s.l.. Phylogenetic analysis based on sequences of the 28S rDNA D2–D3 expansion segment revealed these three species are all distinct species and supported a close relationship with their corresponding species. This is the first report of X. hunaniense, X. brasiliense and X. americanum s.l. in their hosts except for L. chinensis.

show abstract

Section: Morphological Descriptionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Section: Morphological Descriptionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Morphological and molecular characterization of Xiphinema species from Shenzhen, China

Zeng¹,

Zhang

et al. 2016

Helminthologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lordello, 1951 Parasitises cocoa (Afolami & Caveness, 1983), ornamental and flowering plants (Costa et al, 2003), citrus (Crozzoli et al, 1998), peach, grape (Maximiniano et al, 1998) and potato (Lordello, 1951).…”

Section: Xiphinema Brasiliensementioning

confidence: 99%

Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPN) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15) and Zygotylenchus (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.

show abstract

A revised polytomous key for the identification of species of the genus Xiphinema Cobb, 1913 (Nematoda: Longidoridae) with exclusion of the X. americanum-group

Loof¹,

Mathieu

1990

Syst Parasitol

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The species of the genus Xiphinema Cobb, 1913 are listed and their current status is indicated. A revised polytomous key to the 172 valid species (excluding the X. americanum-group) is presented. Because of the very large number of species the key is split into eight groups on the basis of development of the anterior female genital branch, uterine differentiation and tail shape. In accordance with the opinion of Cohn & Sher (1972) X.vulgare Tarjan, 1964 is considered a synonym of X. setariae Luc, 1968. X. cubense Razzhivin, 1973 is placed in species inquirendae. Longidorella chappuisi (Schneider, 1935) is transferred to Xiphinema and its possible identity with X. hygrophilum Southey & Luc, 1974 is discussed.

show abstract

Xiphinema brasiliense, nova espécie de nematóide do Brasil, parasita de Solanum tuberosum L.

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Morphological and molecular characterization of Xiphinema species from Shenzhen, China

Morphological and molecular characterization of Xiphinema species from Shenzhen, China

Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses

A revised polytomous key for the identification of species of the genus Xiphinema Cobb, 1913 (Nematoda: Longidoridae) with exclusion of the X. americanum-group

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About