2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XMM-Newton observation of the distant ($\vec{z=0.6}$) galaxy cluster RX J1120.1+4318

Abstract: Abstract.We report on a 20 ks XMM observation of the distant cluster RX J1120.1+4318, discovered at z = 0.6 in the SHARC survey. The cluster has a regular spherical morphology, suggesting it is in a relaxed state. The combined fit of the EPIC/MOS&pn camera gives a cluster mean temperature of kT = 5.3 ± 0.5 keV with an iron abundance of 0.47 ± 0.19. The temperature profile, measured for the first time at such a redshift, is consistent with an isothermal atmosphere up to half the virial radius. The surface brigh… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of the counting rate between 10 and 12 keV (where the sensitivity to X-rays is very low) was computed for the whole field of view in each observation: this ratio was then used to normalise each background spectrum with respect to the corresponding observation spectrum. Another contribution to the background comes from the soft X-ray background which varies from place to place in the sky: a reference X-ray background spectrum was derived outside SN 1006, analysed in the same way as the SN 1006 spectra and added to the instrumental background to obtain the total background to be subtracted to the observation spectrum in a given region (see Arnaud et al 2002, for a complete description of this method). For each region, we extracted at least 2 and up to 6 spectra, since the different observations overlap in the sky.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of the counting rate between 10 and 12 keV (where the sensitivity to X-rays is very low) was computed for the whole field of view in each observation: this ratio was then used to normalise each background spectrum with respect to the corresponding observation spectrum. Another contribution to the background comes from the soft X-ray background which varies from place to place in the sky: a reference X-ray background spectrum was derived outside SN 1006, analysed in the same way as the SN 1006 spectra and added to the instrumental background to obtain the total background to be subtracted to the observation spectrum in a given region (see Arnaud et al 2002, for a complete description of this method). For each region, we extracted at least 2 and up to 6 spectra, since the different observations overlap in the sky.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that contamination by unresolved point sources of observations made with earlier satellites (e.g., by Fairley et al) was not, on average, a very significant effect. Recent work, assuming a ÃCDM cosmology, has found evidence for positive evolution of the L-T relation (e.g., Arnaud, Aghanim, & Neumann 2002b;Vikhlinin et al 2002); i.e., clusters at high redshift are more luminous for a given temperature (although Holden et al 2002 find no significant evolution in this cosmology). Our data support this general trend of positive evolution, albeit with low statistical significance due to the few points available.…”
Section: Evolution Of Cluster Scaling Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virial radius of a cluster may be estimated using self-similar scaling arguments, normalized to numerical simulations. Here, we adopted the formalism of Arnaud, Aghanim, & Neumann (2002a), which may be applied to a flat…”
Section: Spatial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we transformed the coordinates of the background file such that they were the same as for the associated cluster data set. The background subtraction was performed using the double subtraction process described in full detail in Arnaud et al (2002). It involves subtraction of the normalised blank field data, and subsequent subtraction of the cosmic X-ray background component estimated in the area of the field of view that does not show cluster emission.…”
Section: X-ray Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%