1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05082.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XO FEMALES IN THE VARYING LEMMING, DICROSTONYX TORQUATUS : REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect GILEVA (1987) describes is consistent with the mechanism proposed here. Inbreeding in her colony was "up to 0.25-0.30 by the last (11th) generation" (GILEVA et al 1982); comparable to the inbreeding which apparently caused the male-bias described here. Further, if one accepts my argument that the probability of affecting sex ratio by inbreeding increases with the size of an autosomal attachment to the X, then the two cytotypes studied by Gileva are excellent candidates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect GILEVA (1987) describes is consistent with the mechanism proposed here. Inbreeding in her colony was "up to 0.25-0.30 by the last (11th) generation" (GILEVA et al 1982); comparable to the inbreeding which apparently caused the male-bias described here. Further, if one accepts my argument that the probability of affecting sex ratio by inbreeding increases with the size of an autosomal attachment to the X, then the two cytotypes studied by Gileva are excellent candidates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Most X*Y female wood lemmings produce no sons, implying meiotic drive favoring X*-bearing ova (GROPP et al 1978). But in collared lemmings, X*Y females produce twothirds daughters, implying random segregation ( GILEVA and CHEBOTAR 1979); superovulation largely compensates for inviable XY zygotes (GILEVA et al 1982). In both collared and wood lemmings, X"Xo and X*Xo females appear to produce approximately the sex ratios expected on the basis of normal segregation; that is, one half daughters and three quarters daughters, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of these findings, it seems reasonable to consider an "automatic" rather than an "evolutionary" compensation mechanism in Akodon azarae. The latter mechanism is probably present in the collared lemming, Dicrostonyx torquatus, in which the litter size of XY females is somewhat reduced, but partly compensated for by an increased ovulation rate ( GILEVA et al 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most X*Y female wood lemmings produce no sons, implying meiotic drive in favour of X*bearing ova (Gropp, Fredga, Winking & Frank, 1978). In collared lemmings X*Y females produce two-thirds daughters, implying random segregation (Gileva & Chebotar, 1979); superovulation largely compensates for inviable YY zygotes (Gileva, Benenson, Konopistseva, Puchkov & Makaranets 1982). Assuming an equilibrium of the three types of females and males, these mechanisms should result in population sex ratios of 25% males for wood lemmings and 42% males for collared lemmings (Bull & Bulmer, 1981).…”
Section: Causes Of Female-biased Sex-de'terminki'ion In Lemmingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the normal X chromosome has to be retained for males to occur, sex determination could revert to normal by loss of the X*. Yet despite this apparent fragility, the male-suppressor is ubiquitous among the widespread and chromosomally diverse races of collared lemming (Gileva et al, 1982). Thus the selective forces maintaining this system must be profound, but they are not yet identified.…”
Section: Causes Of Female-biased Sex-de'terminki'ion In Lemmingsmentioning
confidence: 99%