2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPA is susceptible to proteolytic cleavage by cathepsin L during lysis of quiescent cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we re-visited a previous report that the generation of DSBs in UVB- irradiated quiescent cells is dependent on NER (Wakasugi et al, 2014) by using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to knockout XPA in HaCaT keratinocytes, which have been a useful model system for studying DNA damage responses in quiescent cells (Hutcherson and Kemp, 2019; Kemp, 2017; Kemp and Sancar, 2016; Khan et al, 2022; Shaj et al, 2020). In contrast to the previous study (Wakasugi et al, 2014), we find that DSBs are readily detected in UVB-irradiated cells ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here we re-visited a previous report that the generation of DSBs in UVB- irradiated quiescent cells is dependent on NER (Wakasugi et al, 2014) by using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to knockout XPA in HaCaT keratinocytes, which have been a useful model system for studying DNA damage responses in quiescent cells (Hutcherson and Kemp, 2019; Kemp, 2017; Kemp and Sancar, 2016; Khan et al, 2022; Shaj et al, 2020). In contrast to the previous study (Wakasugi et al, 2014), we find that DSBs are readily detected in UVB-irradiated cells ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%