1988
DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(88)90074-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS and ISS characterization of potassium or copper containing Fe/Mn oxide catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased reduction level is accompanied by an unexpected slight increase in dispersion level. The results obtained are consistent with that reported for Co/MnO [38] and Fe/MnO [39] systems, but difficult to correlate with studies where high Mn loadings were used with unsupported Fe:Co catalysts [40] In an effort to improve the performance of the system, the 0.1% Mn promoted Fe:Co/TiO 2 was reduced at two additional temperatures, i.e. 325 and 350°C.…”
Section: Manganese Promotionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The increased reduction level is accompanied by an unexpected slight increase in dispersion level. The results obtained are consistent with that reported for Co/MnO [38] and Fe/MnO [39] systems, but difficult to correlate with studies where high Mn loadings were used with unsupported Fe:Co catalysts [40] In an effort to improve the performance of the system, the 0.1% Mn promoted Fe:Co/TiO 2 was reduced at two additional temperatures, i.e. 325 and 350°C.…”
Section: Manganese Promotionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed on a KRATOS AXIS ULTRA photoelectron spectrometer to obtain information on the catalyst surface composition, which gave information on the distribution of Au and Co on the titania support. The binding energies were corrected by setting the oxidic O1s binding energy at 530 eV [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mn promoter also promotes the formation of amorphous or graphitic carbon and leads to catalyst deactivation [21]. On the other hand, it is found that Mn has some structural promotion and stabilizes the iron-based catalyst [22,23], and the structural promotion also plays an important role in the catalytic performances [24]. When Mn acts at a structural promoter, the chemisorptive properties of the catalyst are affected due to the strong metal support interaction (SMSI) effect, which promotes the transformation of syngas into light olefins [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%