2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS and Kelvin probe studies of SnO2/RGO nanohybrids based NO2 sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C1s peak ( Figure 5 D) was subdivided into three individual peaks after the fitting of the main peak. The peaks at 284, 285, and 288 eV were observed to correspond to C=C, C-OH, and O-C=O, respectively, as shown in a previous study [ 42 ]. These results reveal that the rGO had a residual oxygen group [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The C1s peak ( Figure 5 D) was subdivided into three individual peaks after the fitting of the main peak. The peaks at 284, 285, and 288 eV were observed to correspond to C=C, C-OH, and O-C=O, respectively, as shown in a previous study [ 42 ]. These results reveal that the rGO had a residual oxygen group [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The response time, t 50 , and recovery time, t 50 , are defined as the time interval required for 50% signal change in the full magnitude of the response factor in a sensing cycle . The response time and the recovery time are 54 and 26 s in the measurement of 40 ppm NO 2 , respectively (Figure c), which are comparable to or shorter than the other gas sensors. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, the aggregation and restacking of MoS 2 nanoflowers are not conducive to improving gas adsorption. A possible reason for this behavior may be that the aggregation of MoS 2 nanoflowers weakens the supporting effect of the rGO nanosheets and reduces the probability of NO 2 gas adsorption on the heterogeneous interface between the MoS 2 nanoflowers and the rGO nanosheets, thereby causing a decrease in gas sensitivity [ 70 ]. Therefore, due to its highest response value, MoS 2 /rGO/GQDs-2 was selected to further study the gas-sensing performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%