2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS study of CZTSSe monograin powders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
10
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum of Cu L 3 M 4,5 M 4,5 Auger electrons (Fig. 2e) shows the most intense Cu L 3 M 4,5 M 4,5 ( 1 G) peak at 916.8 eV (in the kinetic energy scale) as well as an Auger parameter of 1849 eV both typical for copper(I) 69,73 thus supporting our above assignment of copper to the Cu(I) state.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The spectrum of Cu L 3 M 4,5 M 4,5 Auger electrons (Fig. 2e) shows the most intense Cu L 3 M 4,5 M 4,5 ( 1 G) peak at 916.8 eV (in the kinetic energy scale) as well as an Auger parameter of 1849 eV both typical for copper(I) 69,73 thus supporting our above assignment of copper to the Cu(I) state.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…2d). The observed Sn 3d 5/2 peak centered at 486.3 eV and the spin-orbit splitting of 8.5 eV are typical for Sn(IV) 24,43,47,61,6769,73 . This assignment is supported by an analysis of the Sn M 4,5 N 4,5 N 4,5 Auger electron energy spectrum (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, a shoulder peak was observed near the Sn 3 d 3/2 peak, which is attributed to the Zn-Auger peak L 3 M 45 M 45 and normally seen in CZTSSe crystals. [ 44 ] This indicates that the CZTSSe phase was only detected after 20 min of sputtering (shorter sputtering was not done)-a sign of secondary phase formation at the back interface. To examine the chemical composition at each sputtered layer, the areas under the curves of Cu 2 p 3/2 , Zn 2 p 3/2 , Sn 3 d 5/2 , and S-Se 2 p were fi tted and calculated by applying Shirley-background subtraction followed by a Lorentzian-Gaussian fi t. Fitted areas were normalized by the relative sensitivity factor of each element and the atomic% of each element was calculated, showing a Zn-and Sn-rich composition (with almost no Cu) at the back interface (Figure 7 f).…”
Section: Wileyonlinelibrarycommentioning
confidence: 99%