2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XRate: a fast prototyping, training and annotation tool for phylo-grammars

Abstract: Background: Recent years have seen the emergence of genome annotation methods based on the phylo-grammar, a probabilistic model combining continuous-time Markov chains and stochastic grammars. Previously, phylo-grammars have required considerable effort to implement, limiting their adoption by computational biologists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe tools such as phylogrammers (Siepel and Haussler 2004a;Klosterman et al 2006), which use standard multiple alignments and rely on the patterns of substitutions, are likely to be joined by potentially richer methods using transducers (Holmes 2003) and other indel-aware evolutionary models (Diallo et al 2007). However, these methods are computationally demanding, and just as fixed alignments are normally assumed by substitutionbased methods, it seems likely that fixed indel histories or complete ancestral reconstructions will be assumed by these techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe tools such as phylogrammers (Siepel and Haussler 2004a;Klosterman et al 2006), which use standard multiple alignments and rely on the patterns of substitutions, are likely to be joined by potentially richer methods using transducers (Holmes 2003) and other indel-aware evolutionary models (Diallo et al 2007). However, these methods are computationally demanding, and just as fixed alignments are normally assumed by substitutionbased methods, it seems likely that fixed indel histories or complete ancestral reconstructions will be assumed by these techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenvalues and eigenvectors might be complex, but they come in complex conjugate pairs and the final result is always real; for more information we refer to the Supplementary Information in [2]. If the CTMC is reversible, the decomposition can be done on a symmetric matrix obtained from Q (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] describes how the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm can be applied to estimate the rate matrix from DNA sequence data observed in the leaves of an evolutionary tree. The EM algorithm is implemented in the software XRate [2] and has been applied in [3] for estimating empirical codon rate matrices. [1] uses the eigenvalue decomposition of the rate matrix to calculate the expected time spent in a state and the expected number of jumps between states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the most promising approach to infer ncRNA ancestors has been proposed in 2009 by D. Bradley and I. Holmes, who introduced an algorithm to calculate ancestral RNA secondary structures from an alignment [15], and use these structures to infer ancestral sequences using a maximum-likelihood approach on stochastic grammars [16]. Still, the time complexity of inferring ancestral structures can be prohibitive, and the specificity of the functional structure may not accommodate sufficiently large variations of this (secondary) structure to take advantage of this model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%