1886
DOI: 10.1080/00222938609459968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XXVI.—Notes on the Palœozoic Bivalved Entomostraca.—No. XXII. On some undescribed species of British Carboniferous Ostracoda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One carapace missing parts of its shells, a second carapace missing one shell, and steinkerns of carapaces are available from USGS collection 13288. In size and posterior outline these specimens resemble the steinkern illustrated by Jones and Kirkby (1865) but differ in lateral outline and dorsal aspect. They are easily differentiated from Chamishaellal sp.…”
Section: A13mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One carapace missing parts of its shells, a second carapace missing one shell, and steinkerns of carapaces are available from USGS collection 13288. In size and posterior outline these specimens resemble the steinkern illustrated by Jones and Kirkby (1865) but differ in lateral outline and dorsal aspect. They are easily differentiated from Chamishaellal sp.…”
Section: A13mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This species differs from Leperditia okeni (Minister). Jones and Kirkby, 1865, in that the ventral margin is not truncated posteriorly. Most of the specimens referred to Leperditia okeni, and later to Paraparchites okeni (Minister, 1830) are misidentified as to species, and some as to genus.…”
Section: Plate 9 Figures 1-44mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species differs from S. armstrongiana (Jones and Kirkby, 1886) in that the spine is closer to the dorsal margin but not as close as in S. spinigera (McCoy, 1844), originally referred to Cythere. The greatest height in lateral outline is closer to the anterior margin in the new species than in both the above species.…”
Section: Genus Proparaparchites Cooper 1941mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The two specimens of this new species distinguish themselves from C . tuherc~ulospinosu (Jones & Kirkby, 1886) by a more elongated shape, due to a slightly extended posterior end. The dorsal spines are less pronounced and the reticulation pattern is variable, reticulum being relatively smaller in the posterior part, along the margins and on the nodes.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new species has similarities in shape and surface ornament to R . reticulosa (Jones & Kirkby, 1886) and R. simplicissima (Knight, 1928). It is distinguished by the presence of two relatively larger posterodorsal spines observable in dorsal view (PI.…”
Section: Explanation Of Platementioning
confidence: 99%