2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001637117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yaravirus: A novel 80-nm virus infecting Acanthamoeba castellanii

Abstract: Here we report the discovery of Yaravirus, a lineage of amoebal virus with a puzzling origin and evolution. Yaravirus presents 80-nm-sized particles and a 44,924-bp dsDNA genome encoding for 74 predicted proteins. Yaravirus genome annotation showed that none of its genes matched with sequences of known organisms at the nucleotide level; at the amino acid level, six predicted proteins had distant matches in the nr database. Complimentary prediction of three-dimensional structures indicated possible function of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Virus genes without any detectable cellular homolog or ORFans, virus-specific genes, constitute >90% of the genes in the proposed family “ Pandoraviridae ” [ 78 ], whose members possess the largest virus genomes ever discovered [ 14 ]. A very recent study identified an amoeba virus (Yaravirus) with a nearly complete ‘ORFan genome’ [ 79 ]. These virus-specific genes are starkly different even among members of the same virus family [ 14 , 32 ].…”
Section: Virus-specific Genes and Virus-to-cell Gene Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virus genes without any detectable cellular homolog or ORFans, virus-specific genes, constitute >90% of the genes in the proposed family “ Pandoraviridae ” [ 78 ], whose members possess the largest virus genomes ever discovered [ 14 ]. A very recent study identified an amoeba virus (Yaravirus) with a nearly complete ‘ORFan genome’ [ 79 ]. These virus-specific genes are starkly different even among members of the same virus family [ 14 , 32 ].…”
Section: Virus-specific Genes and Virus-to-cell Gene Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). For the a newly described amoeba-tropic virus called Yaravirus 30 (Fig. 2A), only Cenote-Taker2 could discern an annotation for any genes, with the major capsid protein (MCP), packaging ATPase, and replicative helicase all being recognizable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true when the objective is to place fast-evolving organisms and viruses in the tree of life [ 64 ]. First, the subset of virus genes for which reliable homologs can be found is extremely small [ 48 ]. This fact greatly limits the choice and the number of available orthologous genes to be used in phylogeny reconstruction.…”
Section: Existing Methods Are Ill-suited To Study Virus Originsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, regular and recent gene uptake from cells is expected to leave detectable similarity traces in the viral genomes. However, >90% of Pandoravirus genes show no similarity to cellular genes [ 24 ] (a feature conserved in many viruses [ 41 ], see also [ 48 ]) and viruses encode several protein fold structures that have never been detected in cells [ 41 ]. It is strange to think that regularly and recently captured viral genes are no longer recognizable whereas presumably ancient ‘core’ genes used to build virus phylogenies are readily recognizable.…”
Section: Origins Of Viruses: Which Hypothesis Is Biologically Plausibmentioning
confidence: 99%