2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00681.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Year‐to‐year variation in carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages on the Åland Islands, south‐west Finland

Abstract: Aims (1) To invesqigate changes in structure of carabid assemblages between sites on the main island of Aland and five small nearby islands between 1.982 and 1,999. (21 To determine whether island differences observed in one year is mirrored in another one. (3) To examine changes in abundance levels of individual carabid species on these islands since 1982. (a) To compare the proportion of flightless species on the main island of Aland with those on the small islands.Location Islands in the Baltic Sea, Finland… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, our observations that species richness and activity density are generally enhanced in organic rather than conventional agroecosystems are in agreement with the lit-erature (Dritschilo and Wanner 1980;Dritschilo and Erwin 1982;Faragalla and Adam 1985;Hokkanen and Holopainen 1986;Kromp 1989Kromp , 1990Booij and Noorlander 1992;Cá rcamo et al 1995;Pfiffner and Niggli 1996;Clark 1999;Shah et al 2003). Year-toyear variability in ground beetle catches could be attributed to many factors such as direct or delayed effects of weather conditions (Abildsnes and Tømmerå s 2000; Kotze and Niemelä 2002) or anthropogenic habitat alteration (Kotze and Niemelä 2002;Rainio and Niemelä 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, our observations that species richness and activity density are generally enhanced in organic rather than conventional agroecosystems are in agreement with the lit-erature (Dritschilo and Wanner 1980;Dritschilo and Erwin 1982;Faragalla and Adam 1985;Hokkanen and Holopainen 1986;Kromp 1989Kromp , 1990Booij and Noorlander 1992;Cá rcamo et al 1995;Pfiffner and Niggli 1996;Clark 1999;Shah et al 2003). Year-toyear variability in ground beetle catches could be attributed to many factors such as direct or delayed effects of weather conditions (Abildsnes and Tømmerå s 2000; Kotze and Niemelä 2002) or anthropogenic habitat alteration (Kotze and Niemelä 2002;Rainio and Niemelä 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…2003). Year‐to‐year variability in ground beetle catches could be attributed to many factors such as direct or delayed effects of weather conditions (Abildsnes and Tømmerås 2000; Kotze and Niemelä 2002) or anthropogenic habitat alteration (Kotze and Niemelä 2002; Rainio and Niemelä 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As island size increased, the structure of the carabid assemblage on islands gradually approached that of the mainland where relative abundances of large-bodied, flightless species and small-bodied, flying species were more similar. In contrast, carabid beetle assemblages on Baltic islands up to~29 ha in size differed distinctly from the mainland (Niemelä et al 1985;Kotze and Niemelä 2002). Below, we suggest three possible explanations for differences that we observed in the structure of the assemblage between the smallest islands, on the one hand, and large islands and the mainland on the other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Because the year ϫ treatment interaction model was nonsigniÞcant, the reasons for those annual variations were more likely related to weather conditions. For example, in carabids, climatological conditions have been regarded as decisive for population ßuctuations (Kotze and Niemelä 2002). González-Megṍas et al (2004) also found different arthropod species composition between years under different ungulate grazing regimens in Sierra Nevada and related them to the temporal variability in habitat productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%