Catholicism, Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century France 2000
DOI: 10.5949/liverpool/9780853239741.003.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yeast in the dough? Catholic schooling in France, 1981–95

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33 This process was confirmed and accelerated by the crisis of 1968. 34 The continued decline of vocations from the 1970s in France also led to the decline in the direct supervision of schools by the Jesuits and other Catholic institutions 35 and less diversity in Jesuit archives, since the mission field had been a primary source for Jesuit archives.…”
Section: % 16% 73%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 This process was confirmed and accelerated by the crisis of 1968. 34 The continued decline of vocations from the 1970s in France also led to the decline in the direct supervision of schools by the Jesuits and other Catholic institutions 35 and less diversity in Jesuit archives, since the mission field had been a primary source for Jesuit archives.…”
Section: % 16% 73%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In return for financial aid, the state had control over staff appointments and school curriculum. The law required Catholic schools ‘to offer exactly the same curriculum as public schools and to accept pupils without selecting them for the religious or other beliefs of their parents’ (Beattie 2000: 204). Moreover, according to the Debré law, the French state dealt with individual Catholic schools rather than with the Catholic Church in the settling of the issue:…”
Section: From ‘Inclusionary Laïcité’ To ‘Exclusionary Laïcité’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption was that those schools would sink or swim in competition with public schools, and the mechanism for survival would be parental choice. (Beattie 2000: 205)…”
Section: From ‘Inclusionary Laïcité’ To ‘Exclusionary Laïcité’mentioning
confidence: 99%