2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yeast membrane proteomics using leucine metabolic labelling: Bioinformatic data processing and exemplary application to the ER-intramembrane protease Ypf1

Abstract: We describe in detail the usage of leucine metabolic labelling in yeast in order to monitor quantitative proteome alterations, e.g. upon removal of a protease. Since laboratory yeast strains are typically leucine auxotroph, metabolic labelling with trideuterated leucine (d3-leucine) is a straightforward, cost-effective, and ubiquitously applicable strategy for quantitative proteomic studies, similar to the widely used arginine/lysine metabolic labelling method for mammalian cells. We showcase the usage of adva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting MaxQuant 27 protein table was processed using Perseus 1.5.6.0 28 implementing Phobius 15 topology predictions (see Table S1 ). The quantified peptides were graphically mapped to the corresponding protein sequences using the Proteator tool ( http://proteator.appspot.com/ ) 38 with I/L nondifferentiation turned on; the html overview of the results can be found in the Supplementary Information. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org ) via the PRIDE partner repository 39 with dataset identifier PXD006716.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting MaxQuant 27 protein table was processed using Perseus 1.5.6.0 28 implementing Phobius 15 topology predictions (see Table S1 ). The quantified peptides were graphically mapped to the corresponding protein sequences using the Proteator tool ( http://proteator.appspot.com/ ) 38 with I/L nondifferentiation turned on; the html overview of the results can be found in the Supplementary Information. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium ( http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org ) via the PRIDE partner repository 39 with dataset identifier PXD006716.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reported minimum probability was chosen to achieve a 1% FDR at both peptide and protein levels. Peptide abundance was calculated using the FeatureFinderMultiplex tool from OpenMS (v.2.3) [43][44][45]. Peptide abundance features were mapped (IDMapper) to the identified peptides (iProphet) followed by IDConflictResolver and MultiplexResolver in OpenMS (v.2.3).…”
Section: Processing Of Mass Spectrometry Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this classification is challenging, as many identified N-terminal peptide sequences match multiple, often distinct, protein sequences in the database. Several web-based software tools visualize peptide position in relation to protein sequences and annotated features: Protter 21 maps peptides to topological and domain features retrieved from UniProt, 22 while QARIP 23 and Proteator 24 additionally visualize peptide abundance data and thereby reveal differentially affected domains, as for example, membrane protein shedding, in quantitative proteome data sets. All of these tools can assist in mapping identified protein termini to sequence features but generate one graphical depiction per protein that requires labor-intensive manual assessment and interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%