2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-011-0761-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yellow-eyed Penguin (Megadyptes antipodes) as a case study to assess the reliability of nest counts

Abstract: Population monitoring of seabirds plays an important role in conservation since it provides the information required to evaluate conservation programmes of endangered species, to guide harvest management and to monitor indicators of marine ecosystem health. Annual nest counts are often used for the long-term monitoring of breeding seabird populations. While such counts provide a direct and cost-effective survey method, single nest counts will almost always yield an underestimate of the true number of nests and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are confident that we have full records of birds due to the intensive monitoring at the study site and annual monitoring at adjacent sites along the coast, and the high level of natal (∼81%) and breeding philopatry (∼98%), and monogamy exhibited by this species ( Richdale, 1957 ; Ratz et al, 2004 ). Birds that skip breeding remain largely undetectable during the breeding season, with only ∼8% of skipped birds in our sample being re-sighted as a non-breeder, however detection of breeders is close to 100% ( Hegg et al, 2012 ). In our sample, 53 yellow-eyed penguins that survived to breed skipped at least one breeding season once they had established breeding, which is not uncommon, particularly in the year following a poor season, death of a mate or a divorce ( Moore, 1994 ; Ratz et al, 2004 ; Setiawan et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We are confident that we have full records of birds due to the intensive monitoring at the study site and annual monitoring at adjacent sites along the coast, and the high level of natal (∼81%) and breeding philopatry (∼98%), and monogamy exhibited by this species ( Richdale, 1957 ; Ratz et al, 2004 ). Birds that skip breeding remain largely undetectable during the breeding season, with only ∼8% of skipped birds in our sample being re-sighted as a non-breeder, however detection of breeders is close to 100% ( Hegg et al, 2012 ). In our sample, 53 yellow-eyed penguins that survived to breed skipped at least one breeding season once they had established breeding, which is not uncommon, particularly in the year following a poor season, death of a mate or a divorce ( Moore, 1994 ; Ratz et al, 2004 ; Setiawan et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We address the former possibility first. The counting population trend detection method involved only counting once, which will almost always yield an underestimate of the true number of nests and provides no means of expressing uncertainty (Hegg et al 2012). However, provided there are not systematic biases in the single nest counts over time, a single count will provide adequate trend estimates, and if there are multiple monitoring sites (as in this study), the uncertainty can be reflected in the error estimate of the modelled rate of change.…”
Section: Population Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%