2005
DOI: 10.1577/m04-193.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yellow Perch Dynamics in Southwestern Lake Michigan during 1986–2002

Abstract: We examined the role of harvest in the collapse of the population of yellow perch Perca flavescens in southwestern Lake Michigan during the mid to late 1990s. After the great decrease in this population at that time, commercial fisheries in Illinois and Wisconsin were closed during 1996-1997 (and have remained closed), and stricter regulations were placed on recreational fisheries. Reproductive failure has been implicated as the primary cause of the population collapse, but the role of fishing in the collapse … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Population models that recreate stocks and analyze changes in demographics have also been developed (Allen 2000;Wilberg et al 2005). For example, Wilberg et al (2005) found that fishing mortality rates were very high from the mid-1980s to the closure of the commercial fishery in 1997.…”
Section: Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population models that recreate stocks and analyze changes in demographics have also been developed (Allen 2000;Wilberg et al 2005). For example, Wilberg et al (2005) found that fishing mortality rates were very high from the mid-1980s to the closure of the commercial fishery in 1997.…”
Section: Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, YP populations in Chesapeake Bay and the Great Lakes supported major recreational and commercial fisheries (Piavis, 1991;Wells, 1977). However, at selected sites or tributaries in both geographic regions, major population declines and a lack of recruitment have occurred (Yellow Perch Work Group, 2002;Clapp and Dettmers, 2004;Wilberg et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher deviance residuals indicate that more fish were caught than would be expected by the model and lower deviance residuals indicate that fewer fish were caught than would be expected by the model. Because yellow perch growth rates are sexually dimorphic (Wilberg et al 2005), large mesh gill net selectivity was estimated separately for males and females as well as in a combined sex analysis. Selectivity in the micromesh was only fit to combined sex, as gender was difficult to determine with these smaller fish.…”
Section: Gill Net Selectivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh sizes are believed to be length-selective (Jensen 1986) and selectivity could be related to morphometric differences in the anterior portion of the fish. Yellow perch growth rates are also known to be sexually dimorphic (Wilberg et al 2005) and if these differences extend to those portions of the fish typically entangled in a gill net, we believe it may influence selectivity curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%