1977
DOI: 10.1029/jb082i026p03665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yellowstone hot spot: Contemporary tectonics and crustal properties from earthquake and aeromagnetic data

Abstract: A compilation of aeromagnetic and new earthquake data is used to characterize the current tectonic activity and crustal properties of the Yellowstone hot spot. Earthquakes located during detailed surveys from 1972 to 1976 occurred west and northeast of the Yellowstone caldera along east‐west zones and south of the caldera in north‐south zones. The change in trend suggests that Yellowstone is at a vertex of the contemporary tectonic patterns. Seismicity showed variations of maximum focal depths from ∼20 km outs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depth sections of seismicity similar to that for the Izu-Oshima volcano have been obtained by observational networks for several active volcanoes: for example, the Sakurajima (Nishi, 1978), Aso (Sudo et al, 1984), Unzen (Matsuo, 1985), and Kirishima (Ida et al, 1986) volcanoes. Smith et al (1977) noted similar features in the focal-depth distribution and thermal structure of the Yellowstone hot spot. Shallow cutoff depths of seismicity can also be seen in many geothermal areas (e.g., NEDO, 1983).…”
Section: Large Earthquakes Near Active Volcanoesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Depth sections of seismicity similar to that for the Izu-Oshima volcano have been obtained by observational networks for several active volcanoes: for example, the Sakurajima (Nishi, 1978), Aso (Sudo et al, 1984), Unzen (Matsuo, 1985), and Kirishima (Ida et al, 1986) volcanoes. Smith et al (1977) noted similar features in the focal-depth distribution and thermal structure of the Yellowstone hot spot. Shallow cutoff depths of seismicity can also be seen in many geothermal areas (e.g., NEDO, 1983).…”
Section: Large Earthquakes Near Active Volcanoesmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…One of the methods for examining the thermal structure of the crust is the estimation of the CPD using aeromagnetic data (Smith et al, 1977;Okubo et al, 1985Okubo et al, , 1989Okubo et al, , 1994Okubo et al, , 2003Tsokas et al, 1998;Tanaka et al, 1999;Stampolidis and Tsokas, 2002;Dolmaz et al, 2005;Ates et al, 2005;Aydin et al, 2005;Qingqing et al, 2008;Li et al, 2010;Li, 2011;Bilim, 2011;Manea and Manea, 2011;Abd El Nabi, 2012;Hisarli et al, 2012;Saleh et al, 2013;Sayed et al, 2013;Abraham et al, 2014;Obande et al, 2014;Starostenko et al, 2014). Various studies have shown correlations between Curie temperature depths and average crustal temperatures, leading to viable conclusions regarding lithospheric thermal conditions in a number of regions around the world (Ross et al, 2006;Rajaram, 2007;Bouligand et al, 2009).…”
Section: Centroid Depth Methods For Calculating Dbms 221 Random Magmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aeromagnetic data have been used at various parts of the world in order to estimate Curie point depths (e.g., VACQUIER and AFFLECK, 1941;SERSON and HANNAFORD, 1957;BHATTACHARYYA and MORLEY, 1965;SCHELLINGER, 1972;DEMENITSKAYA et al, 1973;SMITH et al, 1974SMITH et al, , 1977LEU, 1975, 1977;BYERLY and STOLT, 1977;SHUEY et al, 1977;WASILEWSKI et al, 1979;BLAKELY and HASSANZADEH, 1981;CONNARD et al, 1983;HUPPUNEN, 1983;MAYHEW, 1982MAYHEW, , 1985OKUBO et al, 1985OKUBO et al, , 1989TSELENTIS and DRAKOPOULOS, 1988;BLAKELY, 1988;SMITH et al, 1994;TSO¨KAS et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%