2008
DOI: 10.1080/01638530701739215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yes–No Questions in the Third-Turn Position: Pedagogical Discourse Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee, 2008;Long & Sato, 1983;Thornbury, 1996;Walsh, 2002). These interactions were mostly initiated by teachers when using directives to guide students to the next response move or posing prototypical questions relating to the content displayed in teaching materials (such as PPT, video clips, or the courseware program).…”
Section: Students' Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lee, 2008;Long & Sato, 1983;Thornbury, 1996;Walsh, 2002). These interactions were mostly initiated by teachers when using directives to guide students to the next response move or posing prototypical questions relating to the content displayed in teaching materials (such as PPT, video clips, or the courseware program).…”
Section: Students' Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee, 2008;Long & Sato, 1983;Thornbury, 1996;Tsui, 2001;Walsh, 2002). Although both types of questions can serve as a comprehension check or as a means of clarification or confirmation, several studies have found that teachers' use of display questions is less effective than that of referential questions in promoting student opportunities to use L2, despite the excessive use of display questions in teacher-centered EFL classrooms (Farahian & Rezaee, 2012;Qashoa, 2013;Thornbury, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies have analysed the pedagogical activities that are embedded and accomplished within the sequence and through it, as for example the teacher's continuous evaluation of their students (Heinonen, 2017) and its potential to assume progressivity in the interactive pedagogical project (Lee, 2008). Regardless of the teacher-frontedness of the IRE-sequence, Lee (2008) states that it generates resources for the students and should therefore be considered a learning tool (ibid.). Lee focused on the teacher's third position turn in the form of yes-no questions and their ability "to call for and point to knowledge required of the student" (ibid., p. 257).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the first studies of classroom talk focused on teacher-learner interaction in classrooms with young learners in their native language (L1) (Barnes, 1976(Barnes, /1992Cazden, 2001;Lemke, 1990;Mehan, 1979), talk in adult English as a Second Language (ESL) classrooms has become an increasingly popular area of study over the last 10 years, where the focus has largely been on teacher/learner interactional patterns and how teachers manage student contributions and give feedback (Fagan, 2012(Fagan, , 2015Lee, 2007Lee, , 2008Markee, 1995;Waring, 2008Waring, , 2011Waring, , 2015. A handful of studies have focused on types of talk in the adult ESL classroom, such as teacher self-talk (Hall & Smotrova, 2013), and conversational talk vs. instructional talk (Waring, 2014), and what these types of talk seem to accomplish.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%