2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yes, we have no bananas: Consumer responses to restoration of freedom

Abstract: When stockouts restrict consumers' freedoms, two independent responses can occur: product desirability, or a reactance‐based increase in the desire for the unavailable option, and source negativity, or general frustration with the source of the restriction. In four studies, we provide a novel investigation of consumer responses to stockout‐restoration and examine how these two forces combine to affect consumer responses after freedoms are restored. To do so, we investigate two moderators that influence the act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research could also pursue theoretical avenues that stem from our framework, such as revisiting the emotional antecedents of reactance. Prior work shows that reactance is driven by anger or frustration (Brehm, 1966; Clee & Wicklund, 1980; Moore & Fitzsimons, 2014). Here, we find that it can also be driven by guilt.…”
Section: Coding Of Print Ads From America's Top Ten Magazines By Circmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could also pursue theoretical avenues that stem from our framework, such as revisiting the emotional antecedents of reactance. Prior work shows that reactance is driven by anger or frustration (Brehm, 1966; Clee & Wicklund, 1980; Moore & Fitzsimons, 2014). Here, we find that it can also be driven by guilt.…”
Section: Coding Of Print Ads From America's Top Ten Magazines By Circmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since previous research has shown that consumers respond to self‐discrepancies when contextual cues are present (Boldero & Francis, 2000), adolescents may be more likely to respond to self‐discrepancies when exposed to an advertisement for an age‐restricted product that they are unable to purchase legally because they are too young. Indeed the inability to purchase a product is perceived as a threat to one's self‐concept (Moore & Fitzsimons, 2014).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that one may delay occasionally a purchase because of unexpected events [37]; for example, unexpected business meeting obstructs the backordered customer revisiting the store in time, or even the backordered customer delays the purchase due to avoidance and indecision [38]. Moore and Fitzsimons [39] further showed that consumers may respond negatively to the vendor after the stockoutrestoration. For online purchase situations, although retailers can promptly inform consumers of product availability, consumers do not immediately recover the negative effects of the stockout [40].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, despite the possible delay of vendor or customer, an extra inventory of backordered demand should be held with longer time compared with the rigid assumption in most of the existing EOQ-PBO models that the backordered demand must be fulfilled completely as soon as the new order arrives. We have checked the above-mentioned literatures that are related to the customer's purchase delay behavior, but none of them had introduced the factor of purchase delay into inventory model [3][4][5][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation