1974
DOI: 10.2307/3622739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yet Another Pan Phoneme?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently Milke (1968) demonstrated the assignability of such forms to Proto-Oceanic (POC) *mpoRo 'pig' ; and slightly later the present writer found that cognates are also widespread in the west, extending from Formosa (PuyT verék 'domesticated pig') through the Philippines (Pn belék 'piglet, suckling pig', Tg biik 'suckling pig', Tbl bdrfi 'male pig') to Borneo (Kad vogok 'pig', Kel berek 'domesticated pig'). A cognate (wök) has since been recognized in Old Javanese (Prentice 1974). Based on the distribution of attested meanings it was suggested that Dempwolff's *babuy originally meant 'wild pig', and that forms belonging to the second set could be attributed to a PAN reconstruction *beRek 'domesticated pig'.…”
Section: The Pigmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recently Milke (1968) demonstrated the assignability of such forms to Proto-Oceanic (POC) *mpoRo 'pig' ; and slightly later the present writer found that cognates are also widespread in the west, extending from Formosa (PuyT verék 'domesticated pig') through the Philippines (Pn belék 'piglet, suckling pig', Tg biik 'suckling pig', Tbl bdrfi 'male pig') to Borneo (Kad vogok 'pig', Kel berek 'domesticated pig'). A cognate (wök) has since been recognized in Old Javanese (Prentice 1974). Based on the distribution of attested meanings it was suggested that Dempwolff's *babuy originally meant 'wild pig', and that forms belonging to the second set could be attributed to a PAN reconstruction *beRek 'domesticated pig'.…”
Section: The Pigmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Laryngeal consonants have a long and troubled history in Austronesian (AN) languages (Brandstetter 1916:86, 248, 273, 282-85;Dempwolff 1934-38;Dyen 1953aDyen , 1962Dyen , 1965Tsuchida 1976;Zorc 1982Zorc , 1996Blust 2013:546-53, 567-74). Unlike other segments that have generated controversy in phonological reconstruction, such as *z (Dyen 1951), *R (Dyen 1953b), *b (Prentice 1974), or *d (Dahl 1976:58ff;Ross 1992:40ff), laryngeals in a small number of languages often correspond to zero in the majority of witnesses, raising questions about whether they have been added in a few languages, or lost in all others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%