2016
DOI: 10.1080/1343943x.2015.1133235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield and dry matter productivity of Japanese and US soybean cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The solar radiation from emergence to maturity totaled 1429 and 1623 MJ m −2 in 2014 and 2015, respectively (Table 4), which were 20 to 29% lower than the mean total solar radiation captured from emergence to the R7 stage by nine soybean cultivars studied in Arkansas, U.S.A. (Kawasaki et al, 2016). In terms of the cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) from emergence to the R6 stage, 605 MJ m −2 of CIPAR were required to reach 90% of asymptotic yield (Edwards et al, 2005), and CIPAR ranged from 382 to 400 MJ m −2 for new and old soybean cultivars at a planting density of 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The solar radiation from emergence to maturity totaled 1429 and 1623 MJ m −2 in 2014 and 2015, respectively (Table 4), which were 20 to 29% lower than the mean total solar radiation captured from emergence to the R7 stage by nine soybean cultivars studied in Arkansas, U.S.A. (Kawasaki et al, 2016). In terms of the cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) from emergence to the R6 stage, 605 MJ m −2 of CIPAR were required to reach 90% of asymptotic yield (Edwards et al, 2005), and CIPAR ranged from 382 to 400 MJ m −2 for new and old soybean cultivars at a planting density of 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these values are far from the value of 1.89 g MJ −1 , it would be useful to re-evaluate the RUE that can be achieved in Japan under an optimal growth environment using modern cultivars. Kawasaki et al (2016) demonstrated that Japanese soybean cultivars released from 1971 to 1986 had a lower yield potential than the American cultivars released from 1986 to 2007. This suggested that slow adoption of modern, high-yielding cultivars may be one of the reasons for the low soybean yield in Japan (Hajika, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent yield comparison between Japanese and American cultivars by Matsuo et al 2016 showed that this cultivar had a higher pod number and seed yield than several Japanese cultivars in southwestern Japan. Kawasaki et al 2016 also reported that the American cultivars showed superior seed yield to Japanese cultivars due to their high biomass production capacity and high RUE during the seed-filling stage in a warmer region of Japan. In the present study, CGR and RUE were calculated during the 30 days after R1 in 2014 and from R2 to R5 in 2015, which is earlier than the stages studied by Kawasaki et al 2016 .…”
Section: Indeterminate Cultivars Did Not Always Surpass Determi-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kawasaki et al 2016 also reported that the American cultivars showed superior seed yield to Japanese cultivars due to their high biomass production capacity and high RUE during the seed-filling stage in a warmer region of Japan. In the present study, CGR and RUE were calculated during the 30 days after R1 in 2014 and from R2 to R5 in 2015, which is earlier than the stages studied by Kawasaki et al 2016 . Therefore, further analysis of these parameters, with a focus on the whole growing season, but especially on the late seed-filling stage, will be needed to elucidate the factors responsible for superior seed yield.…”
Section: Indeterminate Cultivars Did Not Always Surpass Determi-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation