2019
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.812.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield and Economic Viability of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill) under Front Line Demonstrations in Kanker District of Chhattisgarh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The additional cost increased in demonstration was due to more cost included in procurement of improved high yielding variety, balance dose of fertilizer and IPM practices. These findings were in agreement with, Markam et al (2019) [6,7] , Wadkar et al (2018) [17] and Shil et al (2014) [13] . Gajendra variety of elephant foot yam is very profitable it gave higher net return of Rs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The additional cost increased in demonstration was due to more cost included in procurement of improved high yielding variety, balance dose of fertilizer and IPM practices. These findings were in agreement with, Markam et al (2019) [6,7] , Wadkar et al (2018) [17] and Shil et al (2014) [13] . Gajendra variety of elephant foot yam is very profitable it gave higher net return of Rs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…402000.00) with higher benefit cost ratio (5.18) as compared to farmers practice. These results were in accordance with the findings of Mishra et al [8], Markam et al [4] and Dhaka et al [6]. No additional cost of per hectare for cultivation.…”
Section: Economics Of Varietal Adoption Demonstrationssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This may be attributed to dissimilarities in soil fertility, salinity and to erratic rainfall and other vagaries of weather in the demonstrations may become necessary to narrow down the gap. These findings are similar to Markam et al[4] and Sharma and Sharma[7].…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation