2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13580-012-0103-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars established at different planting bed size and growing substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in yield among the cultivars are in agreement with a previous study (Maboko et al, 2012) in that cultivars performed differently in terms of yield and quality. The higher plant fresh and dry mass on cultivar Linares (Table 2) is in agreement with Luitel et al (2012) who reported that tomato cultivars varied in terms of vegetative growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Differences in yield among the cultivars are in agreement with a previous study (Maboko et al, 2012) in that cultivars performed differently in terms of yield and quality. The higher plant fresh and dry mass on cultivar Linares (Table 2) is in agreement with Luitel et al (2012) who reported that tomato cultivars varied in terms of vegetative growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In another study with lettuce, Siomos et al [102] found that soilless culture results in higher citric acid percentage compared to soil culture. However, fruit size and quality characteristics also showed no significant difference within substrate of coco-peat, rockwool and masato [103]. Harvesting time of tomatoes had influence on the quality parameters as in September harvest produced higher dry matter and carotenoids content than that of June harvested fruits.…”
Section: Improvement Of Horticultural Produce Quality Through Soillesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For all experiments, the plant height and stem diameter were measured every 10 days after transplantation (DAT) in the growth tents. Fruits were harvested once when the first fruit turned into light red to red stage at around 80-90DAT (Luitel et al, 2012) in the growth tents. Marketable characteristics for tomato were defined as uniformity in color good shape and morphology, good health state and having the weight of greater than 17.5 g (The value of 17.5 g was measured from 10 samples of Sida-tomato that the authors bought from the market in Nonthaburi, Thailand (data not shown)).…”
Section: Observation and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cracked fruits and the ones with weight smaller than 17.5 g were categorized into non-marketable. Observations on fruit characteristics were taken by specific sampling method on five fruits of each group (Luitel et al, 2012). Fruit weight (g) was determined by a digital weight scale 0.01g to 500g (TWK, China).…”
Section: Observation and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%