Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of fodder and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in contrasting environments of northwestern Europe

Laufer, Daniel; Nielsen, Otto; Wilting, P.; Koch, H.; Märländer, Bernward

doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.008

Cited by 30 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Overall, N uptakes exceeded N supply, which is due to a high mineralization rate that is common in soils high in organic matter [18]. Laufer et al reported N uptakes of sugar beet roughly 130-180 kg above the given soil N min content without any further fertilization, and attributed this to the preceding crops-winter wheat, or winter barley [67,69]. In addition, the effect of the previous crop in 2016 is decisive.…”

Section: Nitrogen Concentration and Uptakementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Compared to the PNUtES of sugar beet and fodder beet under comparable climatic conditions in Germany and the Netherlands which ranged from 48 to 110, the determined efficiency of yacon can be seen to be quite low [69]. Possible reasons for this can be the high amounts of aboveground biomass up to 54 t ha −1 , and thus the high N uptakes of yacon [3].…”

Section: Indicators For Plant Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Tuber Yield, Sugar Composition and Nitrogen Uptake of Two Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius Poepp. & Endl.) Genotypes

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The tuberous root crop, yacon, is native to the Andean region and contains high amountsof fructooligosaccharides (FOS) with up to 70% of dry matter. Due to FOS, consumption of tubersmay have health-promoting effects. However, regarding the overall cultivation system, norecommendations exist for farmers on nitrogen fertilization and nitrogen (N) uptake of yacon.Therefore, three different N fertilization levels (0, 40, and 80 kg N ha−1) and two genotypes (brownshelled(BG) and red-shelled (RG)) were examined in a two-year field experiment regarding theirtuber yield, sugar composition, and nitrogen uptake. Tuber yields increased with increasingfertilization level and were highest for B80 and R80 (50 and 67 t FM ha−1), while significantdifferences between the genotypes existed. Sugar and the amount of FOS slightly decreased withincreasing N fertilization level, and ranged between 36% and 73% and 30% and 58% of dry matter,respectively. An overall decreasing amount of FOS led to a slight increase in the amount of FOSwith a higher degree of polymerization. Regarding the N-use efficiency of tubers and the total plant,an N fertilization level of 40 kg N ha−1 seems to favor tuber yield.

show abstract

Section: Nitrogen Concentration and Uptakementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Indicators For Plant Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Tuber Yield, Sugar Composition and Nitrogen Uptake of Two Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius Poepp. & Endl.) Genotypes

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Replacement of fodder beet roots up to 50% from CFM in dairy goats and ewes did not significantly affect, OM, E.E and NFE digestibility (Mousa , 2011).). recently, fodder beet recommended as a source of biomethane due to its high fresh matter yield and digestibility (Laufer et al, 2016). Also, Jonker, (2017) showed that diets with fodder beet decreased methane emissions from dry and lactating dairy cows by 18% less CH4 (g/day) and had 28% lower CH4 yield (g/kg DM intake; P < 0.001) than did cows grazing kale+Str.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feeding Fodder Beet Roots Suplemented With Urea for Lactating Buffalo

Mansour

Alzahar

2018

Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

welve lactating buffaloes with an average weight of 496.7 kg were divided randomly into three similar groups (four animals each). Each group was assigned randomly to one of the following three dietary treatments: Control ration (C) {60% concentrate feed mixture CFM+40% rice straw, fodder beet ration (FB) {40% CFM+20% FB plus 50 gm urea+40% rice straw} and fodder beet silage ration, (FBS) {40% CFM+20% FBS plus 50 gm urea +40% rice straw on DM basis. The experiment was extended for 90 days. The results showed that animals received FB ration recorded the highest values of DM, OM, CP, EE and NFE digestibility followed by FBS ration. The FB group had significant (P<0.05) increases in OMD and CPD, while FBS treated group had the highest values in CFD (P<0.05). Blood serum parameters of FB group had highest values of serum TP, albumin, A /G ratio, glucose and urea (P<0.05), the FBS group had the higher values of serum TP, Albumin, A /G ratio, glucose and urea(P<0.05) than those of control. The (FB) group recorded the highest values of daily milk yield in all periods with average 6.99 kg / head /d., followed by FBS animals (6.69 kg / h/d) then control group (6.51 kg / h /d). The same trend was noticed with significant (P< 0.05) increase in fat corrected milk (FCM) yield (10.02, 9.65 and 8.90 kg / h /d.) for FB, FBS and control groups, resp., FB group recorded the highest values (P< 0.05) of milk total solids, SNF, TP and lactose content, while FBS treated animals had significant higher total solids content and non significant higher milk SNF, TP and ash content than the control group. The FB group had the lowest feed cost to produce one kg FCM (2.88 L.E.) followed by FBS treatment which recorded (2.9 L.E.), while the control group had the highest value (3.51 L.E.). Fodder beet group had the highest economical efficiency value (2.43) followed by FBS treatment (2.41) then the control group which had the lowest value (1.99).

show abstract

“…The additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of variance for sugar beet root yield in 2014 and 2015 Significant at the 1% level GEI participated in total variance with 26.3% in 2014 and 36.2% in 2015, while the influence of G explained 11.5% in 2014 and 24.5% in 2015 LAUFER et al (2016). also reported significant influence of genotype × fertilizer treatment interaction on root yield.…”

mentioning

confidence: 90%

Assessment of sugar beet root yield by AMMI analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sugar beet cultivars have different responses in various environments, such as different locations, years, mineral nutrition treatments or the combination of these factors, due to genotype × environment interaction. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) is one of the most commonly used multivariate methods for analysis and visualization of genotype × environment interaction data. The main goals of the present study were to (i) investigate the application of AMMI method in the analysis of genotype × fertilizer interaction in sugar beet, (ii) to assess genotype × fertilizer interaction, and (iii) to identify sugar beet cultivars with the most stable response and high yield performance across different mineral nutrition treatments. The trial with eight sugar beet cultivars was conducted in two successive growing seasons at Rimski šančevi, Serbia. The different levels of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilizers (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha-1) and their combinations represented specific environments for testing genotype × fertilizer interaction. Results from the analysis of variance indicated that the fertilizer treatment, cultivars, and their interaction significantly affected root yield variation in both seasons. Results from our study suggest that AMMI model with two and three first IPCA axes were recommended in 2014 and 2015, respectively. According to AMMI 1 and AMMI 2 biplot, E14 and E15 were high yielding and among the most stable treatments in both years. Among high yielding genotypes in 2014, G4 and G8 stand out as the most stable, while in the following year G3 had the lowest interaction score. AMMI analysis enabled identification of specific associations between cultivars and different mineral nutrition treatments, which was important for adjustment of 664

show abstract

Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of fodder and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in contrasting environments of northwestern Europe

Cited by 30 publications

References 44 publications

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Tuber Yield, Sugar Composition and Nitrogen Uptake of Two Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius Poepp. & Endl.) Genotypes

Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization on Tuber Yield, Sugar Composition and Nitrogen Uptake of Two Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius Poepp. & Endl.) Genotypes

Feeding Fodder Beet Roots Suplemented With Urea for Lactating Buffalo

Assessment of sugar beet root yield by AMMI analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About