2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield design of reinforced concrete slabs using a rotation-free meshfree method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, an arbitrary concrete slab, as shown in Figure , will be analysed by considering isotropic yield moment conditions Mx+=My+=Mx=My=mp=1.0and the parameter ε = 1/100. Collapse multipliers for three different meshes were reported in Table , showing that present numerical solutions are in good agreement with those obtained in .…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, an arbitrary concrete slab, as shown in Figure , will be analysed by considering isotropic yield moment conditions Mx+=My+=Mx=My=mp=1.0and the parameter ε = 1/100. Collapse multipliers for three different meshes were reported in Table , showing that present numerical solutions are in good agreement with those obtained in .…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Finally, an arbitrary concrete slab, as shown in Figure 17 Table XI, showing that present numerical solutions are in good agreement with those obtained in [25,49].…”
Section: Arbitrary Geometric Concrete Slabsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods for constructing stress and displacement fields in reinforced concrete slabs are considered in [18]. The proposed algorithm based on the Nielsen criterion, using a rotationfree meshless model and a second-order cone as a strength criterion, is in good agreement with these calculations by other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this section, fundamentals of yield design theory are recalled, more details can be found in [45,[51][52][53][54]. Consider a elastic-plastic body of area Ω ∈ R 2 with fixed boundary Γ u and free portion Γ t , satisfying Γ u ∪ Γ t = Γ, Γ u ∩ Γ t = ⊘, and is subjected to body forces f and surface tractions t. Let Σ denotes a space of a statically admissible stress state, whereas Y is a space of a kinematically admissible displacement state.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Yield Design Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%