1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(97)00034-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
202
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 485 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
202
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, considerable advances have been achieved during the last twenty years in the prediction of the sheet metal forming limits by employing yield criteria proposed to provide an improved description of plastic flow under conditions of biaxial loading. For instance, predictions in good agreement with experimental results have been obtained in the case of aluminum alloys [9][10] with the yield criteria proposed by Barlat et al 11 , Karafillis and Boyce 12 and Barlat et al 13 . The effects of the through-thickness normal and shear stress components have also been taken into account within the framework of the M-K model, see the recent works [14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus, considerable advances have been achieved during the last twenty years in the prediction of the sheet metal forming limits by employing yield criteria proposed to provide an improved description of plastic flow under conditions of biaxial loading. For instance, predictions in good agreement with experimental results have been obtained in the case of aluminum alloys [9][10] with the yield criteria proposed by Barlat et al 11 , Karafillis and Boyce 12 and Barlat et al 13 . The effects of the through-thickness normal and shear stress components have also been taken into account within the framework of the M-K model, see the recent works [14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The YLD91 yield criterion was proposed by Barlat et al [22,25] and was written from previous isotropic criterion defined by Hershey and Hosford [26,27]. It can be written as follows:…”
Section: Constitutive Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is enough to mention only some of the most important: Mises [19], Burzyński [7], Hill [9][10][11][12][13], Logan and Hosford [18], Hoffman [14], Tsai-Wu [29], Karafillis-Boyce [15], Rychlewski [22], Barlat et al [1][2][3][4][5]8]. A great number and variety of different criteria make it questionable whether further propositions are really needed, especially when none of the previous ones has been definitely confirmed or rejected for a considerably broad scope of use.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%